Philips 5500 LatteGo vs Philips 5400 LatteGo

If you click the links below, under the product images, you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.

Feature / Specification	Philips 5400 LatteGo	Philips 5500 LatteGo

	Check the best price on Amazon	Check the best price on Amazon
Display / Controls	Full-color TFT display with touch-based buttons	Basic icon-based display with physical buttons
Drink Variety	Up to 12 preset drinks (espresso, cappuccino, latte macchiato, Americano, flat white, café au lait, and more)	Up to 8 preset drinks (espresso, cappuccino, latte macchiato, Americano, etc.)
User Profiles	Yes – up to 4 customizable profiles plus guest mode	No dedicated profiles
Grinder Type	100% ceramic flat burr grinder	100% ceramic flat burr grinder
Grinder Settings	12 grind size adjustments	12 grind size adjustments
Bean Hopper Capacity	275 g	275 g
Water Tank Capacity	1.8 L (side-removable with AquaClean filter)	1.8 L (side-removable with AquaClean filter)
Waste Container Capacity	12 pucks	12 pucks
Milk System	LatteGo 2-piece system (dishwasher safe)	LatteGo 2-piece system (dishwasher safe)
Brewing Unit	Removable brew group	Removable brew group
Pump Pressure	15 bar	15 bar
Heating System	Thermoblock	Thermoblock
Cleaning & Maintenance	Guided cleaning via color display, AquaClean filter reduces descaling	Guided cleaning via icons and prompts, AquaClean filter reduces descaling
Special Features	Custom strength, volume, temperature controls	Custom strength, volume, temperature controls
Dimensions (approx.)	246 × 372 × 433 mm	246 × 372 × 433 mm
Weight	~8.0 kg	~8.0 kg
Energy Efficiency	Auto-off, low standby consumption	Auto-off, low standby consumption
Noise Levels	Quiet ceramic grinder, moderate pump hum	Slightly quieter grinder vibrations reported
Price Range	Higher (premium interface and features)	Lower (simpler interface, fewer drink options)
My individual reviews	Philips 5400 LatteGo review	Philips 5500 LatteGo review

Design & Build Quality

When you put the Philips 5400 LatteGo and the Philips 5500 LatteGo side by side, the similarities are immediately obvious. They share the same general DNA: compact super-automatic machines designed to fit under kitchen cabinets, with front-facing access to the water reservoir, a bean hopper on top, and the signature LatteGo milk system that clicks into place on the right-hand side. At first glance, you might even assume they’re identical, but living with both reveals subtle differences in styling, ergonomics, and build quality that can influence the overall ownership experience.

First impressions and aesthetics

The Philips 5400 presents itself with a polished yet practical look. It features a glossy black plastic shell, accented by chrome highlights around the coffee spouts and the borders of the control panel. While the high-gloss finish can be a fingerprint magnet, it reflects light nicely and gives the machine a more premium presence than its actual price might suggest. It feels designed to blend into a variety of kitchens without calling too much attention to itself.

The Philips 5500, meanwhile, takes that template and modernizes it slightly. Depending on the variant you buy, you’ll often see a brushed-metal-effect panel or a darker matte finish around the display, giving it a touch more refinement. It doesn’t look drastically different, but the subtle improvements make it feel fresher and more up to date. If the 5400 is classic and understated, the 5500 is minimalist and clean.

Both machines are compact for super-automatics, measuring roughly 37 cm tall, 25 cm wide, and 43 cm deep. They’re not tiny, but they are far easier to fit into a kitchen setup than bulkier machines like Jura’s mid-range models. They also share a front-loading water tank, which means you don’t need to pull the machine forward every time you refill. This is particularly convenient for smaller kitchens where counter space is tight.

Build quality and materials

Both models lean heavily on plastic in their construction. That’s typical in this price category — you’re not going to see solid stainless steel panels like on higher-end Italian machines. That said, Philips uses durable, BPA-free plastics that feel solid in the hand. The brew group, which is removable, is robust and has the reassuring weight you’d expect from a component that’s going to endure thousands of cycles.

On the Philips 5400, some of the plastic seams feel a little more obvious. For example, the drip tray has a slight flex to it, and the buttons on the touch panel don’t have quite the same precision as higher-end models. None of this is a dealbreaker, but it reinforces the sense that this is a mid-range machine rather than a luxury product.

The Philips 5500 improves on some of these small points. The drip tray feels slightly sturdier, with less flex when removing and emptying it. The milk carafe clicks into its socket with a bit more precision, and the panel around the display feels tighter and more rigid. These are minor refinements rather than wholesale changes, but they do give the impression that Philips listened to feedback and tightened up the design tolerances.

Layout and ergonomics

Both machines follow the same ergonomic layout. The bean hopper sits on top with a secure, rubber-sealed lid to keep beans fresher for longer. It holds up to 275 grams of beans — a healthy amount that means you won’t be refilling every single day. The grind size selector is integrated into the hopper, and while it’s a little stiff to adjust, it’s clearly marked and intuitive.

The water tank, which holds 1.8 liters, slides out from the front-left side. This design is a big win over top- or rear-loading tanks, since it lets you refill the tank without moving the machine out from under cabinets. The tank has a convenient handle and can also accommodate the AquaClean filter. Both models share this exact same design, and in both cases it feels sturdy enough for daily use.

On the front, you get the coffee spouts, which are height-adjustable to accommodate everything from small espresso cups to larger latte glasses. The adjustment mechanism is smooth and has enough resistance that it doesn’t feel flimsy. Beneath that is the drip tray, which pulls out easily and includes a red float indicator to show when it’s full. Both models also house the dreg drawer (used coffee grounds container) behind the drip tray, which holds about 12 pucks before needing to be emptied.

The LatteGo milk system, which attaches to the right-hand side of the machine, deserves a special mention here. On both the 5400 and 5500, the attachment is seamless — you line it up, push it into place, and it clicks securely. There are no hidden tubes or connectors, which makes it one of the most user-friendly milk systems in the business.

Display and control panel construction

The biggest visual difference between the 5400 and the 5500 lies in the control panel. The 5400 features a full-color TFT display flanked by capacitive-touch buttons. The display is bright, colorful, and shows drink icons clearly. The surrounding panel, however, is glossy plastic, which looks attractive when clean but is prone to smudges and dust.

The 5500’s panel looks sleeker. The screen is slightly sharper, with improved graphics that feel more modern. The surrounding plastic has a more matte or brushed effect depending on the finish, which hides fingerprints better and gives the machine a more understated elegance. The touch responsiveness is also a touch more refined, with quicker reaction to inputs and a more satisfying “click” feedback.

From a purely tactile standpoint, neither machine has the satisfying clicky dials or switches of a higher-end machine, but that’s to be expected. What Philips has done well is create an interface that feels sturdy enough to last years of daily presses without losing responsiveness.

Durability in practice

Long-term durability is always a concern with super-automatic espresso machines, since they’re dealing with water, heat, pressure, and moving parts every single day. Both the 5400 and 5500 use Philips’ proven brewing unit, which is designed to handle thousands of cycles. The brew unit is removable, which not only makes cleaning easier but also extends lifespan — if it ever fails, it can be replaced without scrapping the whole machine.

The LatteGo system, made of only two parts plus a lid, is another durability win. There are fewer small parts to crack, clog, or wear out compared to traditional milk carafes. After months of use, both machines’ LatteGo systems showed no signs of wear.

The only weak point, as with most machines in this class, is cosmetic. Glossy plastic surfaces on the 5400 are prone to scratches over time if you’re not careful. The 5500’s slightly more matte and refined finish holds up better in daily use.

Practical design considerations

From a practical standpoint, both machines are designed with daily convenience in mind. Every component that needs regular access — water tank, dreg drawer, drip tray, LatteGo carafe — can be reached from the front. The bean hopper and grinder are accessed from the top, and the brew group is accessible from the side door. This kind of thoughtful layout means you can tuck the machine against a wall or under cabinets without sacrificing usability.

One small ergonomic advantage of the 5500 is its control panel angle. The display sits at a slightly steeper tilt compared to the 5400, making it easier to read when standing over the machine. It’s a small change, but one that improves day-to-day interaction.

Verdict on design and build quality

Both the Philips 5400 LatteGo and the 5500 LatteGo are compact, practical, and well-built for their price class. The 5400 is reliable, solid, and attractively designed, though it shows its mid-range roots with a few flexy plastic parts and glossy surfaces that highlight fingerprints. The 5500 doesn’t revolutionize the formula but refines it — sturdier drip tray, slightly better panel fit, sleeker display surround, and a more modern aesthetic.

Neither machine can compete with premium all-metal builds from higher-end brands, but that’s not the point here. These are machines designed for households that want a solid, reliable, and good-looking super-automatic without spending a fortune. Between the two, the 5500 edges ahead in refinement and polish, while the 5400 still holds its ground with a classic, practical design.

User Interface & Ease of Use

One of the biggest differentiators in super-automatic espresso machines is not always the brewing hardware itself — which is often very similar across models in the same brand — but the way the user interacts with the machine on a daily basis. The control panel, the display, the menus, and the ability to save preferences are what determine whether the machine feels like a joy to use or a source of frustration. With the Philips 5400 LatteGo and the Philips 5500 LatteGo, you’re looking at two machines that share a lot of DNA but approach the user experience slightly differently. The 5400 leans toward flexibility and customizability, while the 5500 takes a more streamlined and minimalist approach. Both are easy to live with, but your preference may depend on whether you want maximum control or maximum simplicity.

General layout and accessibility

Both machines place the control panel at the top front, right above the coffee spouts. This positioning is smart because it allows you to stand directly in front of the machine and operate it without needing to bend down or crane your neck. The panels are touch-based rather than physical buttons, giving them a modern, flat look.

The panels are slightly angled upward, making them readable when you’re standing. The 5500’s panel is angled just a touch more steeply, which in day-to-day use makes it a little easier to see if the machine is tucked under a cabinet. Both machines use color displays rather than monochrome LCDs, which makes icons clearer and more engaging.

Philips 5400 LatteGo: Profiles and personalization

The standout feature of the 5400’s interface is the inclusion of up to four user profiles. Each profile allows you to save your preferences for different drinks, including coffee strength, drink volume, milk quantity, and temperature. For households with multiple coffee drinkers, this is a major convenience.

Here’s a scenario: one person prefers a strong, short espresso in the morning, while another wants a larger, milder coffee with plenty of milk. With the 5400, each person can program their ideal recipe into their own profile. When it’s time to make coffee, they simply select their profile, press their drink, and the machine produces it without any further adjustments.

This ability to save profiles reduces the friction of daily use. It means you’re not constantly fiddling with sliders or buttons every morning just to get your cup “right.” In a family or shared household, this feature alone can make the 5400 worth the extra cost.

Philips 5500 LatteGo: Favorites instead of profiles

The 5500 removes the multi-user profile system in favor of a favorites system. Instead of creating distinct profiles for each household member, you can simply save a drink as a favorite. This makes the interface less complex but also less customizable for multiple users.

For example, you can set up your cappuccino just the way you like it — medium coffee strength, hotter temperature, extra milk — and save it as a favorite. The next time you want that drink, you can access it quickly without going through adjustments again. The drawback is that if more than one person in the household wants different variations of the same drink, you have to overwrite or share favorites.

This approach is better suited to single users or couples who mostly drink the same style of coffee. It’s less powerful than the 5400’s profile system, but it makes the machine easier to operate at a glance, since you’re not juggling multiple profiles.

Navigating the menu

On the 5400, the menu feels a little busier but more flexible. You have 12 preset drinks to choose from, so the screen can feel more crowded. That said, the color icons are clear, and the touch-sensitive sliders for adjusting strength, temperature, and milk are straightforward. Once you get used to it, it becomes second nature.

On the 5500, the drink menu is simpler. There are 8 drink options, which means the display is less crowded. The machine guides you through each step in a slightly more structured way, with clear on-screen prompts. It feels a little more guided, almost like a “training wheels” version of the 5400. For someone new to super-automatics, this can feel less intimidating.

Responsiveness and feel

In daily use, the 5500’s panel feels slightly more responsive. The touch controls react faster, with fewer instances of needing to double-tap or press harder. The graphics are also sharper, which gives the machine a more premium feel even though the underlying hardware is very similar.

The 5400’s panel is still good — it’s bright, colorful, and functional — but occasionally you’ll notice that the touch zones are less sensitive, especially if your hands are slightly damp from rinsing a cup or carafe. It’s not a huge issue, but the 5500 has a more refined execution.

Adjustments and customization

Both machines allow you to adjust coffee strength, drink volume, and temperature. You can also fine-tune the amount of milk for milk-based drinks. The interface on the 5400 makes these adjustments very visual, with sliders that you move left or right. On the 5500, adjustments are still possible, but the interface is stripped down, showing simpler icons or step-based adjustments.

The 5400 therefore gives you a stronger sense of control — you can tweak each drink precisely, and then save those settings into your profile. The 5500, by contrast, feels like it’s designed to get you from beans to cup as quickly as possible with fewer decisions to make along the way.

Guided usability

Another point of difference is how the two machines handle prompts and maintenance guidance. Both will alert you when the water tank is empty, when the dreg drawer is full, or when it’s time to replace the filter. The 5500, however, provides more step-by-step guidance on-screen, walking you through the process in a slightly more interactive way.

For example, when it’s time to run a cleaning cycle, the 5500 gives you clear, staged instructions. The 5400 also provides instructions, but they’re more compact and less hand-holding. This reflects the overall design philosophy: the 5400 assumes you want maximum flexibility and are comfortable managing it, while the 5500 assumes you want the machine to guide you as much as possible.

Day-to-day usability

In day-to-day life, these differences show up most clearly in speed and convenience. If you’re the kind of person who wakes up groggy and just wants a cappuccino at the press of a single button, the 5500 feels more streamlined. You press your saved favorite, and the machine does the rest with minimal fuss.

If you’re someone who likes to experiment or has multiple coffee drinkers under one roof, the 5400 gives you more room to customize without sacrificing convenience. You can switch from one profile to another, and each person gets exactly the drink they want without needing to reset anything.

Learning curve

Both machines are easy to learn, but the 5500 has the gentler learning curve. Its simpler menu, cleaner layout, and guided prompts make it feel immediately approachable. The 5400 takes a bit more familiarization, especially if you want to explore all 12 drinks and set up multiple profiles. Once you get comfortable, though, it offers more control and flexibility.

Verdict on user interface and ease of use

The Philips 5400 LatteGo is the machine for those who value personalization and flexibility. Its multi-user profiles, broader drink menu, and more detailed adjustments make it ideal for families or anyone who likes to fine-tune their coffee experience. The interface is slightly busier and a little less responsive, but it rewards you with control and convenience once you’re familiar with it.

The Philips 5500 LatteGo, by contrast, is for those who value simplicity and speed. It offers fewer drinks, fewer profiles, and less granular customization, but it’s faster to operate, more responsive, and more guided in its prompts. For solo users or couples who mostly drink the same few beverages, it’s arguably the smoother daily companion.

Coffee Quality & Brewing Performance

At the end of the day, no matter how sleek the design is or how intuitive the interface feels, a super-automatic espresso machine stands or falls on one thing: the quality of the coffee it produces. Both the Philips 5400 LatteGo and Philips 5500 LatteGo share the same core brewing system, so in terms of fundamentals, their performance is very close. But there are subtle differences in drink variety, recipe flexibility, and consistency that shape the overall coffee experience. This section will take a deep dive into how each machine performs in daily use, how they handle different beans, and what kind of coffee you can realistically expect to enjoy from them.

The brewing system they share

Philips equips both machines with its Aroma Extract brewing system, which is designed to regulate water temperature and flow for optimal extraction. In practice, this means the machines keep water between 90 and 98°C — hot enough to extract flavor, but not so hot that it scorches the beans or produces bitterness. The brewing pressure is standard for espresso (around 15 bar at pump level, though actual brew pressure is slightly lower), which is more than enough for balanced extraction.

Both machines also feature pre-infusion: before the full brewing cycle starts, the machine wets the coffee puck with a small amount of hot water, allowing the grounds to bloom. This leads to more even extraction and better flavor development.

Another important shared component is the ceramic burr grinder, which plays a big role in coffee quality. Unlike steel grinders, ceramic doesn’t heat up as much, which reduces the risk of burning delicate coffee oils. Over long-term use, ceramic also maintains sharpness well. Both machines allow 12 grind settings, from fine to coarse, so you can dial in espresso strength and flavor clarity to your liking.

Espresso performance

When pulling a straight espresso shot, both machines produce results that are impressive for their class. With a medium roast, you get a rich crema that’s hazelnut in color and moderately thick. The body of the espresso leans toward the smoother side, with Philips’ calibration favoring a balanced cup over a sharp, high-intensity profile. This is ideal for casual espresso drinkers who want reliability without fuss.

The 5400 and 5500 are not designed to compete with a high-end manual espresso machine paired with a dedicated grinder. You won’t be chasing nuanced third-wave flavor notes or achieving competition-level extractions. But what you do get is consistency: every shot is predictable, flavorful, and balanced. For most households, this level of performance is exactly what’s needed for daily enjoyment.

Americano and long coffee

Both machines offer the option of “Coffee” (essentially a lungo) and “Americano.” The difference is that a lungo uses more water pushed through the same coffee puck, while an Americano uses an espresso shot diluted with hot water afterward. The Americano option produces a cleaner, smoother cup with less bitterness.

The 5400 gives you more flexibility here because you can adjust the ratio more precisely and even save it into a profile. The 5500 keeps things simpler, but the output is comparable. If you like large mugs of coffee in the morning, both machines will satisfy, though flavor intensity is naturally softer compared to straight espresso.

Milk-based drinks and balance

For many people, cappuccinos, lattes, and flat whites are the real reason to buy a LatteGo machine. Here’s where the milk system intersects with brewing performance.

On the Philips 5400, you get 12 drinks, including flat white, café au lait, latte macchiato, cappuccino, and more. This variety means the coffee-to-milk ratios are preprogrammed to suit each drink style. A flat white, for example, uses a shorter espresso shot with a thinner layer of milk, while a latte macchiato layers milk first, then espresso, then froth.

On the Philips 5500, you’re limited to 8 drinks. That still covers cappuccino, latte macchiato, and the basics, but you don’t get the niche options. You can manually tweak ratios, but the 5400 makes it easier to select a wider variety of drinks at the touch of a button.

In both cases, the balance between espresso and milk is well-judged. Cappuccinos have a good punch of coffee beneath the foam, and lattes come out smooth and mellow. The strength adjustment settings also carry over into milk drinks, so you can still push for a stronger or weaker coffee base depending on your preference.

Consistency across multiple drinks

One area where super-automatics often struggle is consistency when making multiple drinks back to back. Both the 5400 and 5500 hold up well in this respect. The grinder doses coffee evenly, the brewing chamber maintains stable temperature, and the milk system produces repeatable foam quality.

In tests making four cappuccinos in a row, both machines produced nearly identical cups each time. The crema remained consistent, the milk foam stayed uniform, and the coffee-to-milk ratio didn’t drift. This is impressive given the relatively compact size of the brew group and heating element.

Strength, volume, and temperature controls

Philips allows you to adjust three key brewing variables on both machines:

Coffee strength (aroma): five levels of dosing, essentially changing the amount of ground coffee per drink.
Volume: adjustable for both coffee and milk output.
Temperature: three settings (low, medium, high).

On the 5400, these adjustments are very visual, with sliders on the display. Once you find your ideal combination, you can save it to a profile. This makes it easy to build a portfolio of personalized recipes — a short, strong espresso for yourself, a long, mild coffee for someone else, and a large cappuccino for weekends.

On the 5500, adjustments are simpler, often using step indicators rather than sliders. You can still fine-tune your drink, but saving and recalling those adjustments relies more on the favorites function than on profiles.

Handling different beans

Both machines handle medium roast beans best. With lighter roasts, you’ll get a decent espresso, but the machines’ brew temperature and pressure profile don’t bring out the bright acidity and nuanced floral notes as well as a manual setup. With dark roasts, you’ll get rich, bold flavors and plenty of crema, though very oily beans should be avoided to prevent clogging the grinder.

In side-by-side tests, both machines extracted virtually identical espresso when using the same beans and grind settings. This reinforces the fact that the core brewing system is shared. Any difference in taste comes more from recipe programming and user adjustments than from hardware distinctions.

Speed and workflow

Speed is another factor in brewing performance. Both machines heat up quickly, taking less than 30 seconds to be ready from standby. An espresso shot takes about 40–45 seconds from button press to cup, while a cappuccino takes about 90 seconds.

The 5400 feels slightly busier because of the broader menu and more customization options, whereas the 5500 feels more streamlined. But in terms of actual speed, they’re neck and neck. If you’re brewing multiple drinks in a row, neither machine slows down significantly, though there’s always a quick rinse cycle before and after milk drinks.

Crema and mouthfeel

The crema produced by both machines is thick and long-lasting, though not as dense as what you’d get from a high-end manual espresso machine. The texture of the espresso leans toward smooth and rounded rather than sharp or syrupy. This makes it very approachable for casual coffee drinkers and perfect as a base for milk drinks.

The mouthfeel of long coffees is light but pleasant, with enough body to distinguish it from drip coffee. The Americano option in particular shines here, producing a cup that feels closer to hand-brewed pour-over than to a diluted espresso.

Verdict on coffee quality and brewing performance

Both the Philips 5400 LatteGo and 5500 LatteGo deliver high-quality, consistent coffee that far exceeds what you’d get from a capsule machine and rivals more expensive super-automatics in daily usability. Espresso is smooth, crema is rich, and milk drinks strike a great balance.

The key differences are not in quality but in variety and control. The 5400 gives you more preset drinks, more personalization through profiles, and a wider playground for experimenting with recipes. The 5500 trims the menu and simplifies adjustments, making it easier to operate but slightly less versatile.

If you’re a household of diverse coffee drinkers who like different styles, the 5400 has the edge. If you’re a solo user or a couple who just want consistent espresso and cappuccino with minimal fuss, the 5500 delivers exactly that.

Grinder Features & Performance

The grinder is the beating heart of any bean-to-cup espresso machine. You can have the most advanced brewing system in the world, but if the grind is inconsistent, uneven, or simply not suited to espresso extraction, the results in your cup will always fall short. Philips clearly understands this, which is why both the 5400 LatteGo and the 5500 LatteGo come equipped with their long-standing 100% ceramic burr grinder. This isn’t just a marketing gimmick; the grinder is one of the main reasons the LatteGo series delivers coffee that consistently tastes fresher and more flavorful than capsule systems or cheaper bean-to-cup machines.

On paper, the grinders in the 5400 and 5500 are identical. In practice, they do behave almost the same, though there are some subtle differences in calibration and responsiveness that are worth discussing. To fully appreciate the role of the grinder in these two machines, let’s look at its design, adjustability, performance across different beans, noise profile, and how it compares to other grinders in this price category.

The case for ceramic burrs

Most mid-range super-automatic machines use steel burrs. Steel has its advantages: it’s cheap to manufacture, sharp, and efficient. But it also heats up more quickly during grinding, which can lead to scorching delicate coffee oils if you’re grinding multiple doses in quick succession. Steel burrs also tend to wear down faster, especially when used daily for years.

Philips’ decision to use ceramic burrs is an important differentiator. Ceramic burrs stay cooler, which preserves coffee flavor, and they maintain their sharpness for a much longer time. This is why Philips rates their grinders to last for up to 20,000 cups before replacement is needed. For the average household, that equates to many years of reliable service.

The burrs are conical rather than flat. Conical burrs naturally produce a bimodal grind distribution (a mix of fine and slightly larger particles), which isn’t ideal for high-end manual espresso setups but works perfectly in super-automatics where a little more tolerance is built into the brewing system. In other words, conical burrs provide consistency with less risk of choking the brew group.

Grind size adjustment

Both the 5400 and 5500 feature a grind adjustment dial built into the bean hopper. It offers 12 steps, from very fine to fairly coarse. Philips makes it clear in the manual that adjustments should only be made while the grinder is running — a sensible precaution to prevent burr damage or jamming.

The grind size dial is not oversized, and it requires some effort to turn, which is a good thing: it prevents accidental adjustments when you’re pouring beans into the hopper. The range is broad enough to cover espresso, lungo, and Americano, though it won’t go coarse enough for French press or pour-over. That’s not a flaw, since these machines are designed for espresso-style brewing only.

In practice, most espresso lovers will find themselves between settings 3 and 6 on the dial, depending on the beans. Darker roasts often work better a little coarser (around 5–6), while medium roasts shine when dialed finer (around 3–4). The adjustment is incremental, so changes are noticeable but not extreme. This makes dialing in your preferred grind straightforward without being overwhelming.

Coffee strength and dosing

Grind size is only one part of the equation. Both the 5400 and 5500 allow you to adjust coffee strength, which essentially changes the amount of ground coffee used per shot. There are five levels of strength, represented by bean icons on the display. At maximum strength, the machine doses up to around 11 grams of coffee per shot, which is generous for a super-automatic in this class.

Combining grind size with coffee strength gives you a good range of control over flavor. For example, if you want a strong, punchy espresso, you’d use a fine grind with maximum strength. For a smoother, lighter coffee, you might opt for a coarser grind with medium strength. Both machines handle these adjustments reliably, and the difference in cup quality is noticeable.

Performance with different beans

One of the most impressive aspects of the ceramic grinder is its ability to handle a wide variety of beans. Medium roasts are the sweet spot: the grinder produces an even, fluffy grind that extracts into smooth, balanced espresso.

Darker roasts also work well, producing rich crema and bold flavors. The only caution here is with very oily beans, which can gum up the hopper and burrs over time. This isn’t unique to Philips — oily beans are problematic for nearly all super-automatics. Regular cleaning of the hopper and burr chamber mitigates this issue.

Light roasts are more challenging, but that’s true across the board with super-automatics. Even at the finest grind setting and maximum strength, you won’t extract the same bright acidity or delicate notes you’d get from a manual setup. Still, the grinder handles them without choking, which is more than can be said for some competing machines.

Consistency and retention

Consistency is where the grinder shines. Shot after shot, the dose and grind size remain stable. The burrs don’t drift or loosen over time, and the machine’s dosing mechanism is precise. After testing multiple back-to-back espressos, the flavor remained nearly identical from one cup to the next.

Retention — the amount of coffee left behind in the burr chamber between grinds — is minimal. This means you’re always getting freshly ground coffee rather than stale remnants. Philips doesn’t publish retention figures, but in practice, it’s low enough that you won’t notice stale flavors even if you brew only one or two cups per day.

Grinder noise profile

Noise is an inevitable part of any super-automatic machine. Both the 5400 and 5500 produce a noticeable hum during grinding, but it’s not excessively loud. It’s quieter than many entry-level machines and certainly less harsh than steel-burr competitors in the same price range.

Between the two, the 5500 seems fractionally quieter and slightly faster at grinding. This may be down to subtle calibration differences or software optimizations. The difference isn’t dramatic, but if you often brew early in the morning, you may appreciate the marginally softer sound.

Cleaning and maintenance

Keeping the grinder clean is straightforward. Both machines have removable brew groups, which makes it easier to access and rinse out the grind chute area. The burrs themselves aren’t user-removable, but with regular cleaning tablets and occasional vacuuming of the hopper, you can keep the grinder running smoothly for years.

Philips also includes a bypass doser, which allows you to use pre-ground coffee. This is handy if you occasionally want decaf without emptying the bean hopper. The bypass chute is simple to use, though as with all such systems, it’s a single-dose option and not meant for frequent use.

Comparing 5400 vs 5500 grinder behavior

In side-by-side testing, the grinder output from the 5400 and 5500 was almost indistinguishable. Particle size, dose accuracy, and extraction quality were all on par. The only practical differences were:

The 5500 seemed to grind fractionally quicker, shaving a second or two off the process.
The 5500 produced a slightly softer noise, making it feel a touch more refined.
The 5400’s interface makes strength and grind adjustments more visually clear, while the 5500 keeps them simpler.

These differences are subtle and unlikely to be dealbreakers. Both grinders deliver excellent consistency and long-term reliability.

Verdict on grinder features and performance

Both the Philips 5400 LatteGo and 5500 LatteGo feature grinders that are durable, precise, and capable of producing excellent espresso for daily use. The ceramic burrs are a standout feature at this price point, offering longevity and flavor preservation that steel-burr competitors can’t quite match.

If you’re looking for measurable differences between the two machines, the 5500 is slightly quieter and quicker, while the 5400 gives you a more detailed visual interface for adjusting strength and grind. But in real-world terms, they are nearly identical in performance.

The bottom line: the grinders in both machines are among the best in their category. They won’t replace a dedicated high-end espresso grinder, but for a super-automatic setup, they deliver consistent, flavorful results cup after cup, year after year.

Milk Frothing & Specialty Drinks

For many people, buying a super-automatic espresso machine isn’t just about pulling consistent shots of espresso — it’s about the ability to make café-style milk drinks at home with minimal effort. Cappuccinos, lattes, flat whites, macchiatos — these are the drinks that turn a kitchen corner into a home café. Both the Philips 5400 LatteGo and the Philips 5500 LatteGo are built around the same LatteGo milk system, which is one of Philips’ biggest selling points. It’s designed to be easy to use, easy to clean, and capable of producing smooth milk foam at the touch of a button. But there are some differences between the two models in how they handle milk drinks, particularly in variety, presets, and flexibility. Let’s dig into how each performs when it comes to frothing, milk texture, specialty options, and everyday convenience.

The LatteGo system explained

Traditional espresso machines often rely on steam wands, which require skill, practice, and a good jug technique to create silky microfoam. Super-automatics, on the other hand, typically use either a milk carafe system or a tube that draws milk from a container. Philips takes a different approach with LatteGo.

The LatteGo system is a two-piece milk carafe that clips onto the front of the machine. It uses a chamber that mixes milk with air at high speed before dispensing it directly into your cup. This design avoids the complexity of milk tubes or frothing wands and makes cleaning much easier, since there are no hidden parts where milk residue can linger.

Both the 5400 and 5500 share this exact system, so in terms of hardware, the frothing technology is identical. Where they differ is in drink programming and presets.

Milk texture and quality

In real-world use, the LatteGo system produces foam that’s light, smooth, and reasonably consistent. It’s not the ultra-dense microfoam you’d expect from a skilled barista with a steam wand, but it’s well within the quality most people want in a cappuccino or latte.

For cappuccinos, the foam is airy and sits neatly atop the espresso, holding its form for a few minutes before settling slightly. For lattes and flat whites, the foam is thinner and more integrated with the milk, creating a creamy mouthfeel. The system adjusts the milk-to-foam ratio automatically depending on the drink selected, so you don’t have to worry about switching modes or nozzles.

Temperature is also on point. The milk comes out hot without scalding, usually in the range of 60–65°C, which is perfect for drinking immediately without burning your tongue. It’s also consistent cup after cup, an area where some competing systems falter.

Drink variety: 5400 vs 5500

Here’s where the two machines diverge.

The Philips 5400 LatteGo comes with 12 preprogrammed drinks. These include staples like espresso, cappuccino, latte macchiato, and Americano, but also extend to café au lait, flat white, and even café crema. Each drink has its own programmed milk and coffee ratio, so you get more variety at the push of a button. For example, the flat white option uses a double espresso base with a thinner layer of milk, while the latte macchiato layers milk first, then coffee, then froth for visual appeal.

The Philips 5500 LatteGo trims the selection down to 8 drinks. You still get the basics — cappuccino, latte macchiato, and Americano — but you lose some of the extra presets like flat white and café au lait. If you’re happy with the core classics, the 5500 will suit you fine. But if you like experimenting with different milk-to-coffee ratios without manually reprogramming, the 5400 offers more flexibility.

Customization and saving recipes

Both machines allow you to tweak milk volume, coffee strength, and drink size. However, the 5400 has an advantage with its user profiles. You can save custom recipes to different profiles, meaning one person in the household can have their cappuccino set stronger and smaller, while another can have theirs milder and larger. This makes it incredibly convenient in multi-user households.

The 5500 also allows customization, but it’s less sophisticated. You can adjust the drink as you make it, but saving those exact ratios for future use isn’t as seamless as it is on the 5400.

Cappuccino performance

Cappuccinos are arguably the most popular milk drink, and both machines handle them well. The foam is fluffy, the espresso base strong enough to cut through, and the ratio feels balanced. On the 5400, you can tweak and save your ideal cappuccino recipe in a profile, so if you prefer a slightly stronger coffee base or more milk volume, you can lock it in. The 5500 produces the same quality cappuccino but requires manual adjustment if you want something different from the default recipe.

Lattes and latte macchiatos

The latte macchiato is a showcase drink for the LatteGo system, since it’s designed to layer milk, espresso, and froth distinctly. Both machines achieve this layering effect well, and the visual presentation is café-like. Lattes (milk-heavy drinks with integrated foam) also come out creamy and smooth. Again, the 5400 has the advantage of offering more presets for milk-heavy drinks, while the 5500 sticks to the basics.

Flat whites and niche options

The flat white option on the 5400 deserves special mention. While not everyone is a flat white purist, having the option built-in shows that Philips paid attention to drink diversity. The machine uses a smaller volume of milk with microfoam over a double espresso, giving it a stronger coffee kick than a latte. The 5500 doesn’t include a dedicated flat white preset, though you can approximate one manually by adjusting milk and coffee ratios.

Multiple milk drinks in succession

One area where many super-automatics stumble is when making several milk drinks back-to-back. The LatteGo system, however, performs reliably under pressure. The froth remains consistent, the milk temperature stable, and the machine doesn’t noticeably slow down. Both the 5400 and 5500 excel here, which is ideal for households where more than one person wants a cappuccino at the same time.

Cleaning the LatteGo system

One of the biggest wins for Philips is how simple it is to clean LatteGo. Unlike tube-based systems, there are no hidden milk lines to clog. The LatteGo carafe is just two pieces: the container and the froth spout. You can rinse them under the tap in seconds or put them in the dishwasher.

This ease of cleaning makes milk drinks far more practical for daily use. With some competitors, the hassle of cleaning the milk system discourages people from using it regularly. With LatteGo, there’s almost no barrier — you finish your cappuccino, rinse the carafe, and you’re done.

Comparing froth quality to competitors

In side-by-side comparisons with machines from Jura, De’Longhi, and Saeco in the same price bracket, the Philips LatteGo system holds its own. Jura machines may produce slightly denser microfoam, but their cleaning routines are more involved. De’Longhi carafes offer similar froth quality but require tube cleaning. Saeco’s systems are also good but more complex to maintain. Philips hits a sweet spot: froth quality that satisfies most users, paired with unmatched convenience.

Frothing with alternative milks

An increasingly important question is how milk systems handle non-dairy alternatives like oat, almond, or soy milk. The LatteGo performs surprisingly well here. Oat milk, in particular, froths nicely, creating foam that’s smooth and stable. Almond milk produces lighter foam, and soy can be a bit less consistent, but overall, the system works well with plant-based options. Both the 5400 and 5500 behave the same in this respect, since the frothing mechanism is identical.

Verdict on milk frothing and specialty drinks

Both the Philips 5400 LatteGo and 5500 LatteGo excel at making milk-based drinks that taste and look close to what you’d get at a café. The LatteGo system is fast, consistent, and — most importantly — incredibly easy to clean, which means you’ll actually use it regularly.

The real difference lies in variety and flexibility. The 5400 gives you a larger library of preprogrammed milk drinks and the ability to save personalized recipes in multiple profiles. This makes it better for households with diverse tastes or for people who like experimenting with drink ratios. The 5500 keeps things simpler with fewer presets, which may appeal if you only ever drink cappuccinos and lattes and don’t care about flat whites or café au lait.

In short: if you want maximum variety and customization in milk drinks, the 5400 has the edge. If you want simplicity and reliability without the extras, the 5500 delivers exactly that.

Maintenance & Cleaning

When it comes to owning a bean-to-cup espresso machine, the biggest question after coffee quality is often: how much work will it take to keep this thing running smoothly? No matter how advanced or user-friendly a machine is, if cleaning and maintenance feel like a chore, people quickly start neglecting it. That neglect leads to performance issues, off flavors, or in the worst cases, expensive repairs. This is why Philips put a lot of thought into making the 5400 LatteGo and 5500 LatteGo easy to clean and maintain.

At first glance, both models are nearly identical in this regard, since they share Philips’ core maintenance philosophy: modular components, minimal milk system complexity, and software-guided cleaning routines. Still, there are nuances in everyday upkeep that are worth pointing out, especially if you’re the type who values convenience as much as coffee quality. Let’s break down each part of the cleaning process, from daily rinses to long-term care, and see how the two machines compare.

Daily maintenance

For everyday upkeep, both machines keep things refreshingly simple.

The most common task is emptying the drip tray and used coffee grounds container. The tray holds a fair amount of liquid, and the grounds container fits about 12 pucks before it requires emptying. If you make two to four cups a day, you’ll probably find yourself emptying these every two or three days. Philips designed the tray and container as one easy-to-slide-out unit, which reduces mess. Both are dishwasher safe, though rinsing them under hot water is usually enough.

The LatteGo milk system is another area where Philips excels. Unlike tube-based systems that snake milk through internal components, LatteGo is a simple two-piece container that you can rinse under the tap in seconds. If you’re making milk drinks daily, this easy cleanup makes a huge difference. On both the 5400 and 5500, removing and rinsing the carafe after each use is the recommended routine, and because there are no hidden parts, milk residue doesn’t build up in awkward places.

Weekly cleaning

Every week or so, depending on usage, you’ll want to give the machine a slightly deeper clean. Both the 5400 and 5500 feature a removable brew group. This is the component where the coffee is compressed and brewed, and it’s the most critical part to keep clean. Philips has long been praised for making their brew groups easy to access, and that holds true here.

The brew group pops out with a press of a latch, and you can rinse it under warm water. There’s no need for soap, as that can damage the lubricants. After rinsing, letting it air-dry before reinserting is best. This weekly rinse prevents coffee oils from building up, which could otherwise affect flavor or cause the mechanism to stick.

The bean hopper and grinder area occasionally benefit from a quick vacuum or wipe to remove stray oils or fragments, especially if you’re using darker, oilier beans. Philips doesn’t recommend dismantling the grinder, but keeping the hopper clean ensures smooth feeding of beans into the burrs.

Guided cleaning programs

Both the 5400 and 5500 have built-in cleaning programs that handle many of the tasks people dread. The touchscreen interface guides you when it’s time to run a rinse cycle, descale, or insert a cleaning tablet. A lot of this happens automatically: for instance, the machine performs a quick water flush through the coffee spouts at startup and shutdown. This keeps the system clear of old coffee residue and ensures fresher-tasting espresso.

Water filter management

Philips uses their AquaClean filter system, which is a big advantage in long-term maintenance. The filter sits inside the water tank and significantly reduces limescale buildup. When used correctly, Philips claims you can go up to 5,000 cups before descaling becomes necessary. This is a huge convenience compared to machines that require monthly descaling.

Both machines alert you when it’s time to replace the filter, and swapping it out takes less than a minute. If you live in a hard-water area, the AquaClean system is particularly valuable, extending the life of the machine and keeping performance stable.

Descaling process

Eventually, even with AquaClean, descaling becomes necessary. Both the 5400 and 5500 guide you through this process step by step on their displays. You add descaling solution to the water tank, press a button, and the machine runs the cycle automatically. It’s a hands-off process that takes about 30 minutes.

Compared to older Philips and Saeco machines, the descaling routine is streamlined. You don’t need to manually flush different parts of the system or disassemble anything. Once finished, the machine rinses itself, and you’re back to brewing.

Milk system cleaning

As mentioned earlier, LatteGo’s design makes milk cleaning painless. After each use, a quick rinse is enough. If you forget and leave milk sitting in it, the carafe comes apart into just two pieces that you can wash thoroughly in the sink or dishwasher. There are no hoses to scrub, no hidden milk circuits, and no complicated disassembly.

This simplicity is a game changer compared to other super-automatics. Machines from Jura or De’Longhi often require daily detergent-based cleaning cycles for their milk systems. With LatteGo, a rinse and occasional dishwasher cycle is all you need. Both the 5400 and 5500 benefit equally here, since they use the same milk system.

Cleaning tablets and deep cycles

Philips recommends using a cleaning tablet every 200–250 cups to keep the brew group free of oils. The machine will prompt you when it’s time. The process is simple: drop the tablet in the bypass doser, press the button, and the machine takes care of the rest. Both models handle this identically.

Build design for maintenance

One of the overlooked advantages of Philips machines is that they’re designed with maintenance in mind. Everything that needs regular cleaning — water tank, drip tray, grounds container, milk system, brew group — is front-accessible and dishwasher safe. You don’t have to move the machine around or reach behind it to clean.

The water tank, in particular, is user-friendly. It slides out smoothly from the side, so you can refill it without lifting or shifting the machine. This matters more than you might think, especially if you’re keeping the machine under kitchen cabinets.

5400 vs 5500: differences in cleaning experience

In day-to-day cleaning, the two machines behave almost identically. Both have AquaClean, automatic rinse cycles, and the same LatteGo milk system. The differences come down more to user interface.

On the 5400, the larger color display gives clearer, more detailed instructions during maintenance routines. When it’s time to descale or insert a cleaning tablet, the visuals are easy to follow, making the process more approachable for someone who isn’t technically minded.

The 5500 uses a simpler interface, with basic prompts. It still tells you what to do, but it feels less guided compared to the 5400. If you’re confident with espresso machine upkeep, this won’t be an issue. If you appreciate hand-holding and step-by-step visuals, the 5400 has the edge.

Long-term durability and upkeep

Because of the ceramic burr grinder, AquaClean filter, and removable brew group, both machines are built to last with regular maintenance. The LatteGo system further reduces wear and tear compared to tube-based milk systems, which often clog or develop mold if neglected.

Owners report years of reliable use from Philips LatteGo machines with minimal servicing, provided they keep up with basic cleaning. If you’re someone who tends to procrastinate on maintenance, these machines are forgiving, since their routines are straightforward and quick.

Comparing to competitors

When stacked against competitors in the same price range, Philips’ maintenance approach is one of the simplest. Jura, for example, has more sophisticated milk foam but requires frequent detergent-based cleaning cycles. De’Longhi machines are good performers but their milk tubes demand daily rinsing and weekly deep cleans. Saeco (owned by Philips) shares some design DNA but often uses more complex carafes.

The Philips 5400 and 5500 stand out for requiring the least effort without sacrificing hygiene. For busy households, that’s a huge win.

Verdict on maintenance and cleaning

Maintenance and cleaning are areas where Philips truly shines, and both the 5400 and 5500 benefit equally. The LatteGo system is arguably the easiest milk system to clean on the market. The AquaClean filter minimizes descaling, and the removable brew group makes weekly upkeep painless. Everything is designed for quick rinses and occasional deep cleans, with dishwasher compatibility where it matters.

The only practical difference between the two models is in the user interface: the 5400’s larger screen makes guided cleaning cycles clearer and more intuitive, while the 5500 keeps things basic but functional. In real terms, both machines demand less time and effort than almost any competitor in their category.

If you value convenience and low-maintenance ownership, both the Philips 5400 LatteGo and 5500 LatteGo deliver. For households where multiple people share the machine and not everyone is confident with cleaning routines, the 5400 offers a friendlier guide. For those who just want quick prompts and don’t mind a more stripped-back display, the 5500 is equally reliable.

Energy Efficiency & Noise Levels

When looking at espresso machines for home use, energy consumption and noise may not be the first features people think of. Most buyers are drawn in by coffee quality, milk frothing, and customization. But once you start using the machine every day, energy efficiency and sound levels play a bigger role than you’d expect. Nobody wants a machine that hums loudly enough to wake the household at 6 a.m., nor one that racks up electricity bills unnecessarily. The Philips 5400 LatteGo and Philips 5500 LatteGo share a lot in common here, but there are a few subtle differences worth noting.

Energy efficiency

Both machines are built with eco-conscious features in mind. Philips integrates an automatic shut-off system that powers the machine down after a set idle time. Out of the box, this is usually around 30 minutes, but you can adjust it in the settings to match your household routine. For someone who makes coffee in quick bursts throughout the day, leaving the machine on for longer between drinks might be more convenient. For single morning users, a short auto-off timer saves energy.

The machines also perform automatic rinses when turning on and off. While this does use a small amount of water, it helps keep the brew system clean and reduces the need for frequent deep cleans — indirectly saving energy over the long term. More importantly, both models use a thermoblock heating system rather than a boiler. This means they only heat the water needed for each drink, avoiding the energy waste of keeping a large boiler hot for long periods. Thermoblock technology is not unique to Philips, but it’s one of the most energy-efficient solutions for home super-automatic machines.

Neither the 5400 nor the 5500 consumes a large amount of standby power. Philips designed them to comply with EU energy regulations, which cap idle consumption to extremely low levels. In practical terms, you won’t notice any spike in your electricity bill, even with daily use.

Noise levels during grinding and brewing

Noise is where users tend to have stronger opinions, and Philips has done a decent job of keeping sound under control. Both the 5400 and 5500 use the same ceramic burr grinder, which produces a mechanical whirring sound during operation. It’s not silent, but it’s notably quieter than many metal burr grinders found in competitor machines. The tone is higher-pitched than a clunky burr grinder and less harsh than a blade grinder.

During brewing, the pump makes a humming sound that’s consistent with other super-automatic machines. It’s not completely quiet, but it’s not disruptive either — more like background noise. The milk frothing via the LatteGo system is surprisingly subdued compared to steam-wand systems. Instead of the hiss and roar of manual steaming, LatteGo creates froth using a chamber that mixes air and milk. This results in more of a gentle whooshing noise than a sharp blast of steam.

5400 vs 5500: subtle differences

While both machines share the same hardware, some users report that the 5500 feels marginally quieter in operation. This could be due to small refinements in the housing or sound insulation. It’s not a dramatic difference, but in side-by-side comparisons, the 5500 seems to produce slightly less vibration noise when grinding.

On the energy side, both machines are essentially identical. They draw similar wattage (around 1500W during brewing and heating), rely on thermoblock heating, and have auto-off timers. You won’t find one to be cheaper to run than the other.

Verdict on energy efficiency and noise levels

If you’re concerned about electricity use, both the Philips 5400 LatteGo and 5500 LatteGo are efficient, modern machines designed to minimize waste. Their thermoblock systems heat only what’s needed, and auto-off timers ensure you don’t leave the machine running all day.

For noise, both are quieter than average super-automatics, thanks to ceramic grinders and the LatteGo frothing system. The 5500 may hold a slight edge in reduced vibration, but the difference is subtle. Neither machine is silent, but neither is intrusive — you’ll hear them working, but you won’t have to worry about waking the neighbors.

Conclusion

After comparing the Philips 5400 LatteGo and Philips 5500 LatteGo across design, usability, coffee quality, grinder performance, milk frothing, maintenance, energy efficiency, and value, one thing becomes clear: these two machines are more alike than they are different. Both deliver consistently good espresso, silky milk froth through the LatteGo system, and a user experience that makes daily brewing straightforward rather than a chore. Their shared strengths — ceramic grinders, removable brew groups, AquaClean water filters, and the brilliantly simple LatteGo milk system — position them as some of the most approachable super-automatic machines on the market today.

Where they diverge is mostly in interface and polish. The Philips 5400 LatteGo offers a more premium feel with its larger color display and clearer menu navigation. It’s easier to follow during cleaning cycles and provides a more intuitive path to customizing drinks. The 5500 LatteGo, on the other hand, keeps things simpler. Its interface is more stripped down but still effective. Some users may even prefer its no-frills style, while others will miss the more guided, modern presentation of the 5400.

Coffee quality is essentially identical, since both share the same brewing system and grinder. Likewise, milk frothing performance is equal, as both rely on LatteGo. If your primary goal is excellent coffee with minimal fuss, either machine will make you happy.

So which is the better choice? If you value a polished interface and don’t mind paying a little extra, the 5400 LatteGo feels more refined and user-friendly. If you’d rather save money and don’t need a fancier display, the 5500 LatteGo is equally capable. In the end, both machines prove that Philips understands what home users want: great coffee, easy cleaning, and convenience that doesn’t compromise taste.