If you’re in the market for an automatic espresso machine but don’t want to spend a fortune, the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo are two strong contenders. Both machines promise fresh bean-to-cup coffee at the touch of a button, but they come with different features, designs, and quirks.
I spent time comparing these two machines in-depth, analyzing everything from design and build quality to coffee performance, grinder efficiency, milk frothing, maintenance, and overall value. If you’re trying to decide between these two, this detailed comparison will help you choose the right one for your needs.
Let’s dive in!
Table of Contents
- 1 Philips 1200 vs De’Longhi Magnifica Evo Comparison Chart
- 2 Design & Build Quality
- 3 User Interface & Ease of Use
- 4 Coffee Quality & Brewing Performance
- 5 Grinder Features & Performance
- 6 Milk Frothing & Specialty Drinks
- 7 Maintenance & Cleaning
- 8 Energy Efficiency & Noise Levels
- 9 Value for Money
- 10 Final Verdict: Which Espresso Machine is Right for You?
Philips 1200 vs De’Longhi Magnifica Evo Comparison Chart
If you click the links below, under the product images, you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.
| Feature | Philips 1200 | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
| Check the best price on Amazon | Check the best price on Amazon | |
| Machine Type | Fully Automatic Espresso Machine | Fully Automatic Espresso Machine |
| Dimensions (W x D x H) | 24.6 x 37.1 x 43.3 cm | 24 x 44 x 36 cm |
| Weight | 7.5 kg (16.5 lbs) | 9.4 kg (20.7 lbs) |
| Water Tank Capacity | 1.8L (removable) | 1.8L (removable) |
| Bean Hopper Capacity | 275g | 250g |
| Used Grounds Container Capacity | ~12 pucks | ~14 pucks |
| Pump Pressure | 15 bars | 15 bars |
| Brewing Temperature Control | Automatic | Automatic |
| Pre-Infusion | Yes | Yes (Advanced) |
| Grinder Type | Ceramic Burr Grinder | Stainless Steel Burr Grinder |
| Number of Grind Settings | 12 | 13 |
| Coffee Strength Levels | 3 levels | 5 levels |
| Adjustable Coffee Volume | Yes | Yes (More precise) |
| Adjustable Water Hardness | Yes | Yes |
| Milk Frothing System | Manual Panarello Steam Wand | Manual Steam Wand (Base Model) / Automatic LatteCrema System (Higher Model) |
| One-Touch Cappuccino & Latte | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (LatteCrema model) |
| Froth Customization | Manual | Adjustable (LatteCrema model) |
| User Interface | Button-based with LED indicators | Touch-sensitive control panel with illuminated icons |
| Drink Options | Espresso, Coffee, Hot Water | Espresso, Coffee, Cappuccino, Latte Macchiato, Hot Water, Flat White (LatteCrema model) |
| Removable Brew Group | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Auto Rinse & Cleaning | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (for LatteCrema system) |
| Descaling Frequency | Every 2-3 months (without AquaClean) | Every 1-2 months |
| Water Filter Compatibility | ✅ AquaClean filter (fewer descaling sessions) | ❌ No built-in filter support |
| Energy-Saving Mode | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes (Eco Mode) |
| Auto Shut-Off Timer | ✅ Yes (Adjustable) | ✅ Yes (Adjustable) |
| Noise Level (Grinding) | ~60-65 dB (quieter) | ~70-75 dB (louder) |
| Noise Level (Brewing) | ~50 dB | ~55 dB |
| Power Consumption | 1500W | 1450-1500W |
| Milk System Cleaning | Manual (Steam Wand Needs Cleaning After Each Use) | Automatic Rinse After Each Use (LatteCrema model) |
| Best For… | Espresso lovers on a budget | Milk-based drink lovers who want convenience |
| My individual reviews | Philips 1200 review | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo review |
Key Takeaways from the Comparison Table
✔ Philips 1200 is best for espresso and black coffee drinkers who want a more affordable, low-maintenance machine with a quiet ceramic grinder.
✔ De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (especially the LatteCrema model) is better for those who love cappuccinos and lattes and want one-touch convenience.
✔ Philips 1200 has lower long-term maintenance costs, thanks to the AquaClean filter reducing descaling needs.
✔ De’Longhi Magnifica Evo offers more drink customization and a more advanced pre-infusion system, resulting in better espresso extraction.
✔ Philips 1200 is quieter, while the Evo is slightly louder but grinds faster.
Design & Build Quality
When it comes to espresso machines, design and build quality play a significant role in both aesthetics and usability. A well-designed machine should not only look great in your kitchen but also feel sturdy, durable, and easy to operate. In this section, we’ll dive deep into how the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo compare in terms of materials, dimensions, ergonomics, and long-term durability.
1. Aesthetics & First Impressions
Philips 1200: Functional and Minimalist
The Philips 1200 is a machine that takes a no-nonsense approach to design. It’s compact, simple, and very much function over form. At first glance, it may not immediately grab your attention—there are no flashy metallic accents or high-end finishes. Instead, Philips has opted for a matte black plastic casing, which gives it a modern yet understated look.
The design is smooth and rounded, making it blend easily into most kitchen setups without taking up too much space. The front panel houses the control buttons and a basic LED display. Since it lacks a touchscreen or premium physical dials, it feels more like an entry-level automatic espresso machine rather than a high-end one.
One area where the Philips 1200 could improve is material choice. The all-plastic exterior feels a little less premium, especially when compared to stainless steel or aluminum finishes seen in higher-end models. However, for its price range, it’s aesthetically pleasing in a simple and practical way.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Sleek and More Stylish
In contrast, the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo has a sleeker, more premium aesthetic. De’Longhi has incorporated a mix of matte and glossy finishes with some stainless steel accents, giving it a more refined look than the Philips 1200.
One of the standout features of the Evo is the front panel design, which includes a more intuitive and modern touch-sensitive interface. Instead of traditional buttons, the Evo features illuminated drink icons, making it feel more like a next-generation machine. This is a nice design touch that adds to the machine’s premium feel.
While still compact, the Evo looks more polished and professional compared to the Philips 1200. If aesthetics matter to you, the Evo is definitely the more stylish choice.
2. Dimensions & Space Efficiency
When choosing an espresso machine, size is an important factor—especially if you have limited counter space.
| Feature | Philips 1200 | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 24.6 cm (9.7 inches) | 24 cm (9.4 inches) |
| Depth | 37.1 cm (14.6 inches) | 44 cm (17.3 inches) |
| Height | 43.3 cm (17 inches) | 36 cm (14.2 inches) |
| Weight | 7.5 kg (16.5 lbs) | 9.4 kg (20.7 lbs) |
Both machines are similar in width, meaning they won’t take up too much space side by side with other kitchen appliances. However, the Philips 1200 is taller, which could be an issue if you have low-hanging kitchen cabinets above your counter.
The Evo is slightly deeper, which means it might protrude more on shallow countertops. However, this extra depth is due to its larger and more advanced internal components, particularly for milk frothing models.
Which One is More Space-Efficient?
- If you have limited height clearance, the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo is better since it’s shorter.
- If you have limited depth space, the Philips 1200 is the better choice because it takes up less front-to-back space.
Overall, both machines are compact and suitable for small kitchens, but the Evo’s shorter height makes it slightly more versatile.
3. Build Materials & Durability
Philips 1200: Mostly Plastic, But Durable
The Philips 1200, as mentioned earlier, leans heavily on plastic construction. This includes the exterior housing, water reservoir, drip tray, and some internal components. While plastic helps keep the machine lightweight and affordable, it doesn’t give the same premium feel as machines with more stainless steel components.
That said, the plastic used is high-quality and durable, designed to withstand heat and pressure. The brew group (the part that holds the coffee puck) is also made of plastic, but Philips ensures it’s easy to remove and clean, which helps with longevity.
However, one downside of plastic-heavy machines is that they can show wear and tear more quickly—scratches, discoloration, or even cracks over time. If aesthetics and durability are a concern, regular cleaning and careful handling are essential.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: More Metal, More Durable
The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo, on the other hand, uses a mix of plastic and stainless steel, which gives it a sturdier and more premium feel. The front panel and key touchpoints, such as the drip tray and cup warming area, incorporate stainless steel elements, making it more resistant to wear and tear.
The brew group is still made of plastic, but the internal components feel slightly more robust than the Philips 1200. Additionally, the buttons and touch controls feel more premium, with a well-designed layout that enhances usability.
In terms of long-term durability, the Evo has the edge due to its higher-quality materials and better overall construction.
4. Ergonomics & Usability
Beyond looks and materials, a coffee machine should be designed for easy daily use.
Philips 1200: Simple, No-Frills Operation
- The water tank (1.8L) is accessible from the front, making it easy to remove and refill.
- The bean hopper (275g capacity) is located on top, with a lid to keep beans fresh.
- The drip tray and used grounds container slide out easily for quick cleaning.
- The manual steam wand is positioned conveniently, but frothing milk takes practice.
Everything about the Philips 1200 is designed for simplicity, which is great for beginners but may feel limiting for users who want more control over their coffee-making experience.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: More Intuitive Layout
- The water tank (1.8L) is also front-accessible, making refills hassle-free.
- The bean hopper (250g capacity) is on top, with a rubber-sealed lid to preserve freshness.
- The automatic LatteCrema system (on milk frothing models) adds convenience for latte and cappuccino lovers.
- The touch controls and drink icons make selecting coffee easier than the Philips 1200’s button-based interface.
One small ergonomic advantage of the Evo is that it offers both automatic and manual milk frothing options, making it more versatile for users of different skill levels.
Verdict: Which Has Better Design & Build Quality?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Aesthetics & Premium Look | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Compact & Space-Saving | Tie (Philips is less deep, Evo is shorter) |
| Material Durability | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| User-Friendly Design | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
Overall, the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo wins in terms of build quality, aesthetics, and usability. It simply feels like a more premium machine with stainless steel accents, touch controls, and a more refined layout.
However, the Philips 1200 is still a solid choice if you prefer a lightweight, compact machine with a straightforward, no-frills design. If budget is a priority, the Philips 1200 provides great value while maintaining durability.
User Interface & Ease of Use
One of the most important factors when choosing an automatic espresso machine is how easy it is to use on a daily basis. Whether you’re a coffee beginner or an experienced home barista, a machine should offer an intuitive interface that allows you to brew coffee effortlessly while still providing customization options.
Both the Philips 1200 and the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo are designed to be user-friendly, but they take different approaches when it comes to their interfaces and control layouts. In this section, we’ll break down how these two machines compare in terms of control panel design, button layout, customization options, learning curve, and overall ease of use.
1. Control Panel & Button Layout
Philips 1200: Simple Button-Based Interface
The Philips 1200 follows a minimalist approach with its physical button interface and basic LED indicator lights. Instead of a digital display or touch-sensitive controls, you get a series of push buttons with icons representing different coffee drinks and settings.
When you first look at the Philips 1200, you’ll notice that it keeps things as simple as possible. The control panel consists of:
- Buttons for coffee selection: Espresso, coffee (larger serving), and hot water.
- Buttons for adjusting coffee strength and volume.
- A milk frothing button (for activating the steam wand manually).
- Indicator lights for alerts such as water tank refills, descaling, and emptying the grounds container.
Since there’s no digital display, all status updates and settings changes rely on LED indicators and button combinations, which may take some getting used to.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Modern Touch Controls with Icons
The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo takes a more modern and user-friendly approach by using a touch-sensitive control panel with illuminated drink icons. This gives the machine a sleeker, more high-tech feel compared to the Philips 1200’s physical buttons.
The control panel includes:
- Clearly labeled drink icons (Espresso, Coffee, Cappuccino, Latte Macchiato, and Hot Water).
- Dedicated strength and volume adjustment buttons.
- Automatic milk frothing options (on models with LatteCrema system).
- A rinse/cleaning button for easy maintenance.
Since everything is clearly labeled and touch-sensitive, the learning curve is much lower compared to the Philips 1200. You simply tap on your desired drink, and the machine does the rest.
2. Customization Options & Coffee Strength Adjustment
Both machines allow you to adjust the coffee strength, volume, and grind size, but the level of control differs.
Philips 1200: Basic Customization
With the Philips 1200, you can customize your coffee by:
- Choosing between three coffee strength levels (mild, medium, strong).
- Adjusting the amount of coffee dispensed using the volume settings.
- Modifying the grind size (using the ceramic burr grinder with 12 settings).
However, the customization is somewhat limited compared to the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo. You don’t have fine control over temperature settings, and changing settings requires pressing button combinations rather than using an intuitive menu.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: More Advanced Customization
The Evo offers more control over your coffee settings, making it a better choice if you like to fine-tune your drinks. You can:
- Choose from five coffee strength levels (instead of three like on the Philips).
- Adjust the coffee volume for each drink.
- Modify the grind size with 13 settings (slightly more than the Philips 1200).
- Customize milk frothing levels (on models with automatic frothing).
Since the Evo uses touch controls, adjusting these settings is more intuitive. There’s no need to memorize button combinations, making it easier for beginners to experiment with different coffee styles.
3. Learning Curve & Ease of Operation
Philips 1200: Simple but Requires Memorization
The Philips 1200 is designed to be beginner-friendly, but it lacks the guided digital menus that some other machines offer. Because of this, the learning curve can feel a little steeper at first.
Potential learning curve challenges:
- Since there’s no screen, you have to memorize LED light indicators for things like descaling or refilling the water tank.
- Adjusting settings requires pressing button combinations, which is not as intuitive as a touchscreen menu.
- Manual milk frothing takes practice, since the steam wand is not automatic.
However, once you get used to how the machine works, the daily operation is straightforward. If you just want to press a button and get espresso, the Philips 1200 does that with no fuss.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Easier for Beginners
The Evo has a much shorter learning curve thanks to its touch-sensitive drink icons and simple interface. Everything is clearly labeled, and there are no cryptic LED indicators to figure out.
Why the Evo is easier to use:
- Each drink option is labeled with an icon, so there’s no guesswork.
- Adjusting coffee strength and volume is done with simple touch controls instead of button combinations.
- Automatic milk frothing (on LatteCrema models) removes the manual frothing challenge.
For complete beginners or those who want the easiest operation possible, the Evo is the more user-friendly machine.
4. One-Touch vs. Manual Frothing
One of the biggest usability differences between these two machines is how they handle milk frothing.
Philips 1200: Manual Steam Wand
- The Philips 1200 has a manual steam wand, meaning you have to heat and froth the milk yourself.
- This gives you more control over milk texture, but requires practice.
- If you’re new to frothing milk, it may take several tries before you get the perfect microfoam for lattes and cappuccinos.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Automatic LatteCrema System (On Certain Models)
- Some Evo models come with De’Longhi’s LatteCrema system, which automatically froths milk and dispenses it directly into your cup.
- If you choose the model with manual frothing, it works similarly to the Philips 1200, but the steam wand feels slightly easier to use.
- Automatic frothing makes the Evo much more convenient if you regularly drink cappuccinos and lattes.
For milk-based drinks, the Evo is the easier machine to use, especially with automatic frothing.
5. Maintenance & Daily Upkeep
A good espresso machine should be easy to clean and maintain.
- Philips 1200: Has a removable brew group, but cleaning reminders are displayed through LED lights, which can be confusing at first.
- De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Also has a removable brew group, but cleaning reminders are clearer and easier to follow due to its better interface.
The Evo is easier to maintain because it provides automatic rinsing options and clearer maintenance indicators.
Final Verdict: Which One is Easier to Use?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Control Panel & Buttons | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Customization Options | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Learning Curve | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Milk Frothing | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (if automatic frothing model is chosen) |
| Maintenance & Cleaning | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
Overall, the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo wins this category because it offers a more modern interface, easier controls, and better customization options. The Philips 1200 is still beginner-friendly, but its lack of a digital display and reliance on button combinations make it slightly harder to use at first.
If you want the easiest experience possible, go with the Evo.
Coffee Quality & Brewing Performance
A coffee machine’s ability to extract high-quality espresso is its most important feature. Even the most beautiful, user-friendly machine is useless if it doesn’t produce a rich, flavorful shot of coffee.
Both the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo are fully automatic espresso machines, meaning they grind fresh coffee beans, extract espresso, and (in some cases) froth milk at the touch of a button. However, they use different brewing technologies that affect the quality of the final cup.
This section will compare their coffee quality in-depth, looking at:
✅ Brewing technology
✅ Extraction performance
✅ Crema quality & espresso texture
✅ Coffee strength & flavor balance
✅ Temperature consistency
✅ Customizability & consistency of results
1. Brewing Technology & Pressure System
Philips 1200: Aroma Extract System
The Philips 1200 uses what the company calls its Aroma Extract system, which automatically balances brewing temperature (90-98°C) and water flow rate to optimize flavor.
- It operates at 15 bars of pressure, which is standard for home espresso machines and ensures proper extraction.
- The machine pre-infuses the coffee puck, meaning it wets the grounds slightly before full extraction. This helps develop more even and rich flavors in the coffee.
- The brewing process is fully automated, ensuring consistency in every shot.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Advanced Pre-Infusion & Adaptive Grinding
The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo also operates at 15 bars of pressure, but De’Longhi’s brewing system is slightly more advanced:
- It uses an adaptive grinding and brewing system, adjusting grind size and extraction time automatically to match the coffee beans used.
- Like the Philips, the Evo also includes pre-infusion, but it seems to be more effective, producing a slightly richer and fuller-bodied shot.
- The Evo has more customizable brewing options, allowing you to fine-tune coffee strength and volume more precisely.
Which brewing system is better?
✅ Winner: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo
Both machines are solid in brewing, but the Evo extracts a more balanced, flavorful shot due to its adaptive system and superior pre-infusion process.
2. Crema Quality & Espresso Texture
A good espresso should have a thick, golden crema on top, which adds smoothness and enhances the overall coffee experience.
Philips 1200: Decent Crema, But Lighter Body
The Philips 1200 produces a good crema, but it tends to be slightly thinner and lighter compared to higher-end machines. The espresso has a smooth, balanced flavor, but some users may find it less intense or complex than expected.
- The crema is light golden and medium thickness but dissipates faster than the Evo’s.
- The shot has a milder taste, which may be preferable for those who like smooth, less bitter coffee.
- If you like bold, full-bodied espresso, you might find it a bit weak.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Richer, Thicker Crema
The Evo consistently produces thicker, richer crema compared to the Philips 1200. This is likely due to its pre-infusion process and better water distribution.
- The crema is deeper golden, thicker, and lasts longer.
- The espresso has a fuller mouthfeel, making it more enjoyable for those who like strong coffee.
- The flavors are more pronounced and layered, offering a slight edge in complexity compared to the Philips.
Which machine has better crema?
✅ Winner: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo
The Evo consistently delivers a richer, thicker crema, making for a more luxurious espresso experience.
3. Coffee Strength & Flavor Profile
Philips 1200: Milder, Smoother Espresso
The Philips 1200 excels at making smooth, easy-drinking espresso. Even at its highest strength setting, it tends to lean toward a balanced, mild flavor rather than an intense, concentrated shot.
- Best for: People who enjoy smooth, medium-bodied coffee without too much bitterness.
- Downside: Some espresso enthusiasts may find the coffee a bit weak, especially at default settings.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Stronger, Bolder Espresso
The Evo produces a richer, more full-bodied espresso, especially when set to higher strength levels.
- Best for: People who love bold, strong espresso with more depth of flavor.
- Flavor balance: Slightly more complex, allowing you to taste chocolatey and nutty notes more clearly.
Which machine produces better flavor?
✅ Winner: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo
The Evo offers a stronger, more flavorful shot, while the Philips is better for those who prefer smooth, easy-drinking coffee.
4. Temperature Stability & Brewing Time
Philips 1200: Good, But Can Be Inconsistent
- The Philips 1200 heats up quickly, but some users have noted that the first shot may be slightly cooler than expected.
- Once warmed up, it maintains a good brewing temperature, but not as precisely as the Evo.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: More Consistent Temperature
- The Evo maintains a more stable brewing temperature, leading to more consistent extraction results.
- The first shot is hotter and more balanced, making it more reliable overall.
Which machine has better temperature control?
✅ Winner: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo
The Evo maintains better temperature stability, ensuring consistently hot espresso.
5. Customization & Consistency
Philips 1200: Limited Adjustments
The Philips 1200 allows you to adjust:
✔ Three coffee strength levels (mild, medium, strong).
✔ Coffee volume (adjustable, but no presets for different cup sizes).
✔ Grind size with 12 settings (via the built-in ceramic grinder).
While these settings work well for everyday use, they lack fine-tuning options compared to the Evo.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: More Control Over Customization
The Evo provides:
✔ Five coffee strength levels (instead of three like the Philips).
✔ More precise volume adjustments for each drink.
✔ 13 grind settings (one more than Philips, but still useful).
This makes the Evo more versatile, allowing you to experiment with different coffee styles more effectively.
Which machine is more customizable?
✅ Winner: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo
The Evo provides more customization, making it the better choice for coffee lovers who like fine-tuning their espresso.
Final Verdict: Which Machine Makes Better Coffee?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Brewing Technology | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Crema Quality | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Coffee Strength & Flavor | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Temperature Stability | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Customization & Control | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
✅ Overall Winner: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo
While both machines make good espresso, the Evo produces stronger, more flavorful coffee with a richer crema and better customization. If you prefer smooth, mild espresso, the Philips 1200 is still a solid choice.
Here’s an expanded Grinder Features & Performance section, covering the grinder type, grind size settings, noise levels, durability, and overall performance of the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo.
Grinder Features & Performance
One of the biggest advantages of fully automatic espresso machines like the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo is that they come with built-in grinders. This eliminates the need for a separate grinder and ensures you always get fresh coffee at the touch of a button. However, not all built-in grinders are created equal.
A high-quality grinder is essential because:
✅ It affects the coffee’s flavor and aroma.
✅ It determines the consistency of the coffee puck, impacting extraction.
✅ It influences how much control you have over the brewing process.
In this section, we’ll compare the grinder quality, grind size options, performance, noise levels, and durability of the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo.
1. Grinder Type: Ceramic vs. Stainless Steel
Philips 1200: Ceramic Burr Grinder
The Philips 1200 features a ceramic burr grinder, which is a great choice for espresso machines. Ceramic burrs have several advantages:
✔ They don’t heat up as much as metal grinders, which helps preserve coffee flavor by preventing overheating.
✔ They last longer than stainless steel grinders, as ceramic doesn’t wear down as quickly.
✔ They provide consistent grind size, which is important for even coffee extraction.
However, ceramic burr grinders are more fragile than stainless steel. If a foreign object (like a small stone) gets into the grinder, it can crack the burrs, which can be expensive to replace.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Stainless Steel Burr Grinder
The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo uses a stainless steel burr grinder, which is more common in mid-range espresso machines.
✔ Stainless steel burrs are incredibly durable and can withstand more impact than ceramic.
✔ They provide fast and efficient grinding, making them ideal for high-volume use.
✔ They still offer a consistent grind, but they can heat up slightly more than ceramic during extended use.
One potential downside of stainless steel is that, because they generate more heat than ceramic burrs, this can slightly alter the taste of the coffee over time. However, for most home users, this is unlikely to be noticeable unless you make multiple espressos back-to-back.
Which Grinder Type is Better?
✔ If you want a cooler, more flavor-preserving grind, the Philips 1200’s ceramic burrs are the better option.
✔ If you want durability and longevity, the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo’s stainless steel burrs are more resilient.
2. Grind Size Settings & Customization
Both machines allow you to adjust the grind size, which is crucial for tweaking the strength and extraction quality of your espresso.
| Feature | Philips 1200 | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Number of grind settings | 12 | 13 |
| Grind adjustment method | Dial inside the bean hopper | Dial inside the bean hopper |
| Effect on coffee strength | Good but limited precision | More control over extraction |
Philips 1200: 12 Grind Settings
The Philips 1200 offers 12 grind size adjustments, which is a decent range for an entry-level super-automatic espresso machine.
- The coarser settings work well for long coffees (like Americano).
- The finer settings improve espresso extraction, but the finest grind is not as fine as a commercial espresso grinder.
One drawback is that adjusting the grind size requires turning a small dial inside the bean hopper. This means you have to pause brewing, open the lid, and make the adjustment, which can be a bit inconvenient.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: 13 Grind Settings
The Evo has 13 grind settings, offering slightly more control over coffee extraction.
- The extra grind setting allows for finer tuning, which can be useful if you like experimenting with different beans.
- Like the Philips, the grind adjustment is inside the bean hopper, requiring you to stop brewing to adjust.
While the difference between 12 vs. 13 grind settings may seem small, the Evo offers slightly better grind precision, which contributes to better espresso extraction overall.
Which Machine Offers Better Grind Customization?
✔ De’Longhi Magnifica Evo wins because of its extra grind setting and slightly finer grind precision.
3. Grinder Performance & Espresso Extraction
Philips 1200: Smooth, Balanced Coffee
The Philips 1200 grinder produces a consistent grind, ensuring a smooth and balanced espresso. However:
- The finest grind setting isn’t as fine as a true espresso grind, which may result in slightly weaker coffee compared to a manual espresso machine.
- The grind consistency is very good, but some users have reported that medium-coarse settings can sometimes cause under-extraction.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Richer, Stronger Coffee
The Evo’s grinder tends to produce slightly better coffee extraction, thanks to:
- A more precise grind size, which allows for better flavor extraction.
- Better consistency in fine grind settings, leading to a richer espresso shot.
- A slightly stronger coffee taste, making it ideal for those who like bold flavors.
Which Grinder Performs Better?
✔ The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo wins, producing richer, stronger espresso with better extraction control.
4. Noise Levels & Grinding Speed
Noise can be an important factor, especially if you make coffee early in the morning and don’t want to wake up the whole household.
| Feature | Philips 1200 | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Noise Level | Quieter (Ceramic grinder) | Louder (Stainless steel grinder) |
| Grinding Speed | Slightly slower | Faster |
Philips 1200: Quieter, But Slower
- The ceramic grinder operates more quietly, which is a plus for those who want a low-noise morning routine.
- However, it’s slightly slower than the Evo’s grinder, meaning grinding takes a few extra seconds.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Faster, But Louder
- The stainless steel grinder is louder, which might be an issue in noise-sensitive homes.
- However, it’s faster, meaning you get your coffee a few seconds quicker.
Which Machine is Quieter?
✔ The Philips 1200 wins for lower noise levels.
✔ The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo wins for faster grinding.
Final Verdict: Which Grinder is Better?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Grinder Type (Flavor & Longevity) | Philips 1200 (Ceramic burrs) |
| Grind Settings & Customization | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (13 settings) |
| Espresso Extraction Quality | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Noise Levels | Philips 1200 (Quieter) |
| Grinding Speed | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (Faster) |
✔ If you want a quieter machine with a long-lasting grinder, go for the Philips 1200.
✔ If you want better espresso quality, more grind control, and faster grinding, the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo is the better choice.
In general, the Evo’s grinder is superior for coffee quality, while the Philips 1200’s grinder is better for noise-sensitive users.
Milk Frothing & Specialty Drinks
For many coffee lovers, a good espresso is just the beginning. If you enjoy cappuccinos, lattes, macchiatos, or flat whites, a high-quality milk frothing system is essential.
Both the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo are equipped to handle milk-based drinks, but they take very different approaches. The Philips 1200 relies on a manual steam wand, while the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo offers both manual and automatic milk frothing options (depending on the model you choose).
In this section, we’ll compare their milk frothing capabilities, ease of use, foam quality, and specialty drink options to help you decide which machine is better suited for your coffee preferences.
1. Milk Frothing System: Manual vs. Automatic
The biggest difference between these two machines is how they handle milk frothing.
Philips 1200: Manual Panarello Steam Wand
The Philips 1200 comes with a Panarello-style manual steam wand, meaning you control the frothing process yourself.
- How it works: You place the steam wand into a jug of milk and manually froth it by adjusting the angle and depth.
- Level of control: You have full control over the frothing process, allowing you to create different textures of milk (from dense foam for cappuccinos to silky microfoam for lattes).
- Learning curve: The manual wand requires practice. If you’re new to steaming milk, it may take a few tries to perfect your technique.
Pros of the Philips 1200’s Steam Wand:
✔ More control over milk texture for different drinks.
✔ Better for latte art, since you can create finer microfoam.
✔ Easier to clean, since there’s no milk reservoir to maintain.
Cons of the Philips 1200’s Steam Wand:
✖ Requires practice—not beginner-friendly.
✖ Takes more time, since you have to froth the milk separately.
✖ Less consistent results, as milk texture depends on your technique.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Automatic LatteCrema System (on Certain Models)
The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo offers two milk frothing options:
- Manual steam wand (on the base model)
- LatteCrema automatic milk system (on the higher-end model)
1. Manual Steam Wand (Similar to Philips 1200)
- If you get the Evo with a manual steam wand, it works just like the Philips 1200.
- However, the wand on the Evo is slightly easier to use and produces more consistent froth.
2. Automatic LatteCrema System (For Hands-Free Frothing)
- The LatteCrema system froths milk automatically and dispenses it directly into your cup.
- Just press a button, and the machine steams and pours the milk for you—no skill required.
- You can adjust the froth level, choosing between denser foam (for cappuccinos) or silky microfoam (for lattes).
- The milk container is detachable, so you can store unused milk in the fridge.
Pros of the De’Longhi LatteCrema System:
✔ Completely automatic—no effort needed.
✔ Consistent, high-quality froth every time.
✔ Adjustable foam levels for different drinks.
✔ Detachable milk container for easy storage.
Cons of the De’Longhi LatteCrema System:
✖ More parts to clean, since the milk container and frothing system require maintenance.
✖ Less control over milk texture for latte art.
✖ Slightly bulkier design, since it includes a milk reservoir.
Which Frothing System is Better?
✔ If you want complete control and are willing to learn, the Philips 1200’s manual steam wand is better.
✔ If you prefer convenience and hands-free milk frothing, the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema model) is the clear winner.
2. Milk Foam Quality & Consistency
Good froth should be creamy, smooth, and free of large bubbles.
Philips 1200: Good Foam with Practice
- Since it’s a manual system, the foam quality depends on your technique.
- Once mastered, you can create excellent microfoam for lattes and dense foam for cappuccinos.
- However, beginners may struggle to get consistent results.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Automatic & Reliable Foam
- The LatteCrema system produces excellent foam automatically, with adjustable density.
- The froth is consistent, well-textured, and creamy, making it ideal for cappuccinos and lattes.
- While it can’t match a skilled barista’s hand-frothed milk, it’s very reliable for everyday use.
Which Machine Produces Better Foam?
✔ For latte art and customization: Philips 1200 (manual steam wand).
✔ For convenience and consistency: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema system).
3. Specialty Drinks & One-Touch Options
A great super-automatic espresso machine should offer variety beyond just espresso.
| Drink Type | Philips 1200 | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Espresso | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Long Coffee | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Cappuccino | ⚠ Manual milk frothing | ✅ One-touch (LatteCrema model) |
| Latte Macchiato | ⚠ Manual milk frothing | ✅ One-touch (LatteCrema model) |
| Flat White | ❌ No preset option | ✅ Yes |
| Hot Water (Tea) | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Philips 1200: Basic Coffee Selection
- You get espresso, regular coffee, and hot water.
- Milk-based drinks require manual frothing, so there are no one-touch cappuccino or latte buttons.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: More Variety & One-Touch Drinks
- If you get the LatteCrema model, you can make cappuccinos, lattes, and flat whites with one touch.
- The base model requires manual frothing, similar to the Philips 1200.
Which Machine Offers More Specialty Drinks?
✔ Winner: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema model)—more drink variety and automatic frothing.
Final Verdict: Which Machine is Better for Milk Drinks?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Ease of Frothing | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema model) |
| Milk Foam Quality | Tie (Philips for manual control, Evo for convenience) |
| Specialty Drink Options | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Best for Beginners | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (automatic frothing) |
| Best for Advanced Users | Philips 1200 (manual frothing control) |
✔ If you love milk drinks but don’t want to learn how to froth milk manually, go for the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema model).
✔ If you enjoy customizing your milk texture and want control over frothing, the Philips 1200 is a great option.
Maintenance & Cleaning
No matter how good an espresso machine is, regular maintenance is crucial to ensure it continues to produce high-quality coffee and lasts for years. A well-maintained machine not only delivers better-tasting coffee but also prevents potential issues like clogged grinders, mold buildup in milk systems, and scale accumulation in internal components.
Both the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo are designed to be user-friendly in terms of maintenance, but they have different cleaning processes, automated features, and long-term upkeep requirements.
This section will cover:
✅ Daily maintenance
✅ Cleaning the brew group
✅ Descaling procedures
✅ Milk system cleaning
✅ Cleaning alerts & automation
✅ Long-term durability
1. Daily Maintenance: Ease of Cleaning
Philips 1200: Straightforward Manual Cleaning
The Philips 1200 is designed for easy maintenance, but most cleaning tasks are manual.
- The drip tray and coffee grounds container slide out easily and should be emptied every 2-3 days (depending on usage).
- The brew group is removable, allowing for manual rinsing under running water, which is a big advantage for ensuring freshness.
- The water tank should be rinsed weekly to prevent any bacterial buildup.
Biggest cleaning challenge: Since the Philips 1200 has a manual steam wand, milk cleaning requires extra effort. You must wipe the wand after every use and purge it with steam to prevent milk residue buildup.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: More Automation for Easy Cleaning
The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo offers more automated cleaning features, making daily maintenance easier.
- The drip tray and grounds container are similar in design to the Philips and need to be emptied every 2-3 days.
- The brew group is removable, just like the Philips 1200, allowing for manual rinsing under water.
- The LatteCrema milk system (on select models) has an automatic cleaning function, making milk cleaning much simpler compared to the Philips manual wand.
Biggest cleaning advantage: The Evo’s LatteCrema system automatically flushes itself after making a milk-based drink. This saves a lot of time compared to manually rinsing a steam wand like on the Philips 1200.
Which Machine is Easier to Maintain Daily?
✔ Winner: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo
The Philips 1200 is easy to clean, but the Evo’s automatic milk system cleaning makes maintenance much simpler for milk-based drinks.
2. Cleaning the Brew Group (Essential for Long-Term Performance)
The brew group (also called the brewing unit) is the core of the espresso machine—it’s where coffee is ground, tamped, and extracted. Keeping this part clean is essential for consistent coffee quality and preventing mold buildup.
Philips 1200: Fully Removable Brew Group
- The brew group is completely removable, which is a huge advantage.
- Philips recommends rinsing it under running water once per week.
- Since you can manually clean every part of the brew group, there’s less risk of coffee oil buildup and blockages over time.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Also Removable, But Slightly More Complex
- The Evo’s brew group is also removable, making it easy to rinse under water.
- However, some users report that the De’Longhi brew unit requires more frequent lubrication to keep it running smoothly.
- Philips’ brew group design is slightly simpler to clean compared to the Evo.
Which Machine Has the Easier Brew Group Maintenance?
✔ Winner: Philips 1200
Both machines have removable brew groups, but the Philips 1200’s design is easier to clean and requires less maintenance over time.
3. Descaling & Scale Prevention
Descaling is one of the most important maintenance tasks for any espresso machine, as mineral buildup from water can clog internal components and affect coffee quality.
Philips 1200: AquaClean Filter Reduces Descaling Frequency
- The Philips 1200 includes an AquaClean water filter, which significantly reduces scale buildup.
- If you use the AquaClean filter, you only need to descale the machine about once every 5,000 cups.
- Without the filter, descaling is required every 2-3 months, depending on water hardness.
Descaling process:
- The machine will alert you when it needs descaling.
- You add descaling solution to the water tank and run the cycle (takes about 30 minutes).
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Descaling Required More Frequently
- The Evo does not come with a water filter, so descaling is required more frequently than on the Philips.
- Expect to descale every 1-2 months depending on water hardness.
- De’Longhi’s descaling process is similar—just add the descaling solution and run the cycle.
Which Machine Requires Less Frequent Descaling?
✔ Winner: Philips 1200
The AquaClean filter reduces descaling frequency, making maintenance easier in the long run.
4. Milk System Cleaning
If you drink milk-based beverages, cleaning the milk system is one of the most important (and often overlooked) tasks.
Philips 1200: Manual Steam Wand Requires Daily Cleaning
- You must wipe the wand after every use to prevent milk residue buildup.
- A purge (steam blast) is required after frothing to remove milk traces inside the wand.
- If milk dries inside the steam wand, it can clog the nozzle and be difficult to clean.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Automatic Milk Cleaning (On LatteCrema Models)
- The LatteCrema system auto-cleans itself after every milk drink.
- You just need to rinse the milk carafe occasionally and deep clean it weekly.
- There’s less manual effort compared to cleaning a steam wand.
Which Machine is Easier to Clean for Milk Drinks?
✔ Winner: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema model)
If you drink milk-based drinks frequently, the Evo’s automatic milk system cleaning is a major convenience advantage.
5. Cleaning Alerts & Automation
A good espresso machine should remind you when cleaning is needed so you don’t have to track everything manually.
Philips 1200: LED Indicators for Cleaning Alerts
- The LED panel displays alerts for descaling, emptying the drip tray, and cleaning the brew group.
- However, since it’s just LED lights, you need to remember what each indicator means.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: More Intuitive Cleaning Reminders
- The Evo has clearer cleaning alerts, making maintenance easier to track.
- On LatteCrema models, the milk system prompts you to clean it after every use.
Which Machine Has Better Cleaning Alerts?
✔ Winner: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo
The Philips 1200’s alerts require some memorization, while the Evo provides clearer reminders.
Final Verdict: Which Machine is Easier to Maintain?
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Daily Cleaning | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Brew Group Cleaning | Philips 1200 |
| Descaling Frequency | Philips 1200 (AquaClean filter) |
| Milk System Cleaning | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema model) |
| Cleaning Alerts | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
✔ If you want the lowest maintenance possible, go with the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo.
✔ If you want fewer descaling sessions, the Philips 1200 is a better long-term choice.
Here’s an expanded Energy Efficiency & Noise Levels section, covering power consumption, eco-friendly features, and grinder noise levels for the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo.
Energy Efficiency & Noise Levels
Energy efficiency and noise levels are often overlooked when choosing an espresso machine, but they can significantly impact your electricity bill and overall experience—especially if you make coffee early in the morning or live in a household where noise matters.
In this section, we’ll compare how energy-efficient these machines are and how much noise they produce during operation.
1. Energy Efficiency & Power Consumption
Both the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo are designed with eco-friendly features to reduce energy consumption when idle.
Philips 1200: Low Energy Consumption
- The Philips 1200 has an automatic energy-saving mode, which shuts down the machine after 15 to 30 minutes of inactivity (you can adjust this in settings).
- Power consumption during operation is 1500W, which is standard for home espresso machines.
- The AquaClean filter reduces the need for frequent descaling, which helps improve long-term energy efficiency.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Eco Mode & Auto Shutoff
- The Evo has a dedicated Eco Mode that reduces power usage when idle.
- It also has an automatic shutoff feature, but it can be programmed for different time intervals (from 9 minutes to 3 hours).
- The power consumption is also 1450-1500W, similar to the Philips 1200.
Which Machine is More Energy-Efficient?
✔ Winner: Tie
Both machines are designed to be energy-efficient, with auto shutoff features and comparable power consumption.
2. Noise Levels: Which Machine is Quieter?
Espresso machines can be noisy, especially when grinding beans.
| Feature | Philips 1200 | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Grinder Type | Ceramic Burrs (Quieter) | Stainless Steel Burrs (Louder) |
| Noise Level During Grinding | ~60-65 dB (Moderate) | ~70-75 dB (Louder) |
| Noise Level During Brewing | ~50 dB (Quiet) | ~55 dB (Slightly Louder) |
Philips 1200: Quieter Operation
- The ceramic burr grinder is naturally quieter than stainless steel, making the Philips 1200 one of the quieter super-automatic machines in this price range.
- The grinding noise is around 60-65 dB, which is noticeable but not disruptive.
- Brewing itself is fairly quiet, around 50 dB (similar to a normal conversation).
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Slightly Noisier
- The stainless steel burr grinder is louder, producing around 70-75 dB during grinding (comparable to a blender on a low setting).
- Brewing is slightly noisier than the Philips, but still acceptable for home use.
Which Machine is Quieter?
✔ Winner: Philips 1200
The Philips 1200 is quieter due to its ceramic grinder, making it the better choice for noise-sensitive users.
Final Verdict: Energy Efficiency & Noise Levels
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Energy Efficiency | Tie |
| Noise Levels (Grinding) | Philips 1200 |
| Noise Levels (Brewing) | Philips 1200 |
✔ If you want the quietest operation, go with the Philips 1200.
✔ If noise isn’t a concern, both machines are equally energy-efficient.
Value for Money
When investing in an espresso machine, it’s important to consider not just the upfront cost, but also the features, build quality, coffee quality, maintenance expenses, and long-term durability. A machine that seems affordable initially may end up costing more over time due to frequent maintenance, expensive filters, or limited durability.
In this section, we’ll compare the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo in terms of price, included features, long-term costs, and overall value for different types of coffee drinkers.
1. Price Comparison
Pricing varies depending on the model and region, but here’s a general comparison:
| Machine | Approximate Price Range |
|---|---|
| Philips 1200 | $400 – $550 |
| De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (Basic Model, Manual Frothing) | $500 – $650 |
| De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema Model, Automatic Frothing) | $650 – $800 |
Philips 1200: More Budget-Friendly
- The Philips 1200 is one of the most affordable fully automatic espresso machines with a built-in grinder.
- If you primarily drink espresso or black coffee, it provides great value for the price.
- However, if you love milk-based drinks, the lack of an automatic frothing system may be a downside.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Higher Price, More Features
- The base model is slightly more expensive than the Philips 1200 but offers better coffee quality and a more advanced grinder.
- The LatteCrema model (automatic milk frothing) costs significantly more, but if you drink cappuccinos and lattes daily, the added convenience may be worth it.
- If you rarely drink milk-based drinks, the extra cost of the LatteCrema system may not be justified.
2. Features vs. Price: Which Machine Offers More for the Money?
| Feature | Philips 1200 | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Brew Group | Removable | Removable |
| Grinder Type | Ceramic (quieter, long-lasting) | Stainless Steel (durable, slightly better grind) |
| Grind Settings | 12 | 13 |
| Coffee Strength Options | 3 levels | 5 levels |
| Milk Frothing | Manual steam wand | Automatic (LatteCrema model) or Manual (Base model) |
| One-Touch Cappuccino/Latte | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (LatteCrema model) |
| Descaling Frequency | Less frequent (AquaClean filter) | More frequent (no filter) |
Philips 1200: Best for Espresso Drinkers on a Budget
✔ If you mainly drink espresso or black coffee, the Philips 1200 offers the best value.
✔ It has a ceramic burr grinder, which preserves coffee flavor better than stainless steel.
✔ The AquaClean filter reduces descaling frequency, which saves time and effort.
✖ If you drink milk-based drinks, manual frothing takes extra effort—which might not be ideal for busy mornings.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Best for Milk Drink Lovers
✔ If you love cappuccinos and lattes, the LatteCrema model is worth the extra money for one-touch milk drinks.
✔ It offers better espresso quality with more grind and strength customization options.
✔ The automatic frothing system is more convenient than the Philips’ manual wand.
✖ The base model (manual frothing) is more expensive than the Philips but offers fewer milk-drink benefits.
✖ It requires more frequent descaling since it lacks an AquaClean filter.
3. Long-Term Costs & Maintenance Expenses
A machine’s long-term value depends on how much you spend on maintenance over time.
| Expense | Philips 1200 | De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Water Filter (Optional) | $20-30 every few months (AquaClean) | No filter option |
| Descaling Solution | Less frequent (due to AquaClean) | More frequent descaling needed |
| Milk System Cleaning (For LatteCrema Model) | Manual cleaning of steam wand (free) | Requires cleaning solution for LatteCrema system |
Philips 1200: Lower Long-Term Costs
- The AquaClean filter greatly reduces descaling frequency, meaning you save money on descaling solutions.
- Manual milk frothing doesn’t require extra cleaning supplies.
- Overall, it’s a cheaper machine to maintain over time.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: More Costs for Milk Frothing Models
- Since it doesn’t have a built-in water filter, it requires more frequent descaling, increasing long-term maintenance costs.
- The LatteCrema model requires milk system cleaning after every use, which means spending on cleaning solutions.
Which Machine Has Lower Long-Term Costs?
✔ Winner: Philips 1200
- If you use the AquaClean filter, maintenance costs are lower than the Evo.
- The LatteCrema system (on the Evo) requires more frequent cleaning and extra costs.
4. Which Machine Offers Better Value for Different Buyers?
| If you… | Best Machine | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Want an affordable, high-quality espresso machine | ✅ Philips 1200 | Lower cost, solid espresso quality, cheaper maintenance |
| Drink mostly black coffee or espresso | ✅ Philips 1200 | No need for a fancy milk system, great for espresso |
| Love cappuccinos & lattes and want convenience | ✅ De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema model) | One-touch milk frothing, better for milk drinks |
| Don’t mind manual milk frothing | ✅ Philips 1200 or Evo (Base Model) | Both work, but Philips is cheaper |
| Want a machine with the lowest long-term maintenance | ✅ Philips 1200 | AquaClean filter reduces descaling costs |
| Want more customization over coffee strength & grind | ✅ De’Longhi Magnifica Evo | More grind settings & strength levels |
Which Machine is the Best Value?
✔ For espresso lovers on a budget: Philips 1200 offers fantastic value for those who don’t need automatic milk frothing.
✔ For milk-based drink lovers: De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema model) is worth the investment for one-touch cappuccinos and lattes.
✔ For the lowest long-term costs: The Philips 1200 is cheaper to maintain due to fewer descaling needs and no milk system cleaning costs.
Here’s an expanded Final Verdict section, summarizing the strengths of each machine and helping potential buyers make the best choice based on their preferences.
Final Verdict: Which Espresso Machine is Right for You?
Both the Philips 1200 and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo are excellent entry-level fully automatic espresso machines, but they cater to different types of coffee drinkers.
If you’re choosing between these two, it ultimately comes down to your coffee habits, priorities, and budget.
Philips 1200: Best for Espresso Lovers on a Budget
✔ Who Should Buy It?
- If you mostly drink espresso or black coffee and don’t need one-touch milk frothing.
- If you want an affordable, high-quality machine with low long-term maintenance costs.
- If you prefer a quieter coffee machine (thanks to its ceramic grinder).
- If you don’t mind manually frothing milk and want control over milk texture.
✔ Why Choose It?
- Lower upfront and long-term costs.
- AquaClean filter reduces descaling needs.
- Reliable, easy-to-clean brew group.
- Compact design and quieter operation.
De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Best for Milk Drink Lovers & Customization
✔ Who Should Buy It?
- If you love cappuccinos, lattes, and other milk-based drinks and want an automatic frothing system.
- If you want more control over coffee strength and grind settings (5 strength levels vs. 3 on Philips).
- If you prefer a more modern, touch-sensitive interface.
- If you want one-touch convenience for milk-based drinks (LatteCrema model).
✔ Why Choose It?
- Better espresso quality with richer crema.
- More customization for grind size and strength.
- Automatic milk frothing for effortless cappuccinos and lattes.
- More intuitive cleaning reminders and automation.
Which Machine Offers Better Overall Value?
| Preference | Best Machine |
|---|---|
| Best budget-friendly option | ✅ Philips 1200 |
| Best for black coffee & espresso | ✅ Philips 1200 |
| Best for cappuccinos & lattes | ✅ De’Longhi Magnifica Evo (LatteCrema model) |
| Most customizable coffee options | ✅ De’Longhi Magnifica Evo |
| Easiest to clean | ✅ Philips 1200 (for espresso) / Evo (for milk drinks) |
| Best for quiet operation | ✅ Philips 1200 |
| Best long-term maintenance | ✅ Philips 1200 |
✔ Final Choice:
- If you want the most affordable, hassle-free espresso experience, go with the Philips 1200.
- If you love milk-based drinks and want the best convenience, the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo is worth the extra cost.