Philips 4400 LatteGo vs De’Longhi Magnifica Evo

Choosing the right automatic espresso machine can be overwhelming, especially when you’re caught between two top contenders like the Philips 4400 LatteGo and the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo. Both aim to deliver café-style coffee at home, but they take different approaches in design, features, and user experience. I’ve spent weeks testing each one—pulling shots, frothing milk, tweaking settings, and running cleaning cycles—to understand how they perform in real-world, everyday use. Whether you’re looking for a hassle-free coffee maker that does it all at the push of a button, or a machine that gives you more manual control to refine your brew, these two options cater to distinct needs. This review breaks down every key aspect—from design and build quality to coffee taste, grinder performance, and ease of maintenance. By the end, you’ll know exactly which machine better suits your routine, preferences, and what kind of coffee drinker you are.

Philips 4400 LatteGo vs De’Longhi Magnifica Evo Comparison Chart

If you click the links below, under the product images, you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.

Specification	Philips 4400 LatteGo	De’Longhi Magnifica Evo
	Check the best price on Amazon	Check the best price on Amazon
Machine Type	Super-automatic espresso machine	Super-automatic espresso machine
Dimensions (W × D × H)	12″ × 18″ × 14″	14″ × 18.5″ × 17″
Weight	Approx. 17.6 lbs (8 kg)	Approx. 20.9 lbs (9.5 kg)
Housing Material	High-quality plastic with stainless accents	Brushed stainless steel front, plastic sides
Grinder Type	Ceramic flat burr	Stainless steel conical burr
Grind Settings	12-step adjustment	13-step adjustment
Bean Hopper Capacity	275 grams (9.7 oz)	250 grams (8.8 oz)
Water Tank Capacity	1.8 liters (60.8 oz), side-access	1.8 liters (60.8 oz), front-access
Used Grounds Capacity	Approx. 12 servings	Approx. 14 servings
Brew Group Access	Removable (side door)	Non-removable
Milk Frothing System	Automatic LatteGo system (tube-free carafe)	Manual steam wand (LatteCrema system on select models)
Milk System Cleaning	Fully detachable, dishwasher-safe	Manual cleaning and purging required
Drink Customization	Adjustable strength, volume, and temperature	Adjustable strength, volume, grind size
Display & Controls	Touch interface with backlit icons and rotary knob	Physical buttons with strength knob and indicator lights
Coffee Drink Options	Espresso, coffee, cappuccino, latte macchiato, milk froth	Espresso, coffee, doppio+, cappuccino
Pre-ground Coffee Option	Yes (bypass chute)	Yes (bypass chute)
Auto Rinse & Cleaning	Yes (on/off cycle rinse)	Yes (on/off cycle rinse)
Descaling Notification	Yes, guided on-screen instructions	Yes, LED indicator
Water Filter Compatibility	Yes (AquaClean filter)	Yes (optional De’Longhi water filter)
Heating System	Single Thermoblock	Single Thermoblock
Coffee Temperature Range	~190–195°F (adjustable)	~200–203°F (fixed)
Noise Level	Low (quiet grinder and operation)	Moderate to high (louder grinder and steam wand)
Auto Shut-off	Yes, programmable	Yes, fixed
Energy Saving Mode	Yes	Yes
Included Accessories	Measuring spoon, AquaClean filter, grease, test strip	Measuring spoon, water filter (on some models), test strip
Warranty	2 years	2 years
My individual reviews	Philips 4400 review	De’Longhi Magnifica Evo review

Design & Build Quality

When you’re investing in an espresso machine that’s likely to sit on your counter for years—and see daily use—the way it’s designed and built matters a lot more than just aesthetics. You want a machine that not only looks good in your space but also feels solid, functions smoothly, and holds up to repeated use without showing wear. The Philips 4400 LatteGo and the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo represent two very different design philosophies: one leans into sleek minimalism and user-friendliness, while the other embraces a more traditional, robust style with a tactile feel. Here’s a detailed breakdown of how they stack up.

Philips 4400 LatteGo: Streamlined Modernity

Philips has clearly designed the 4400 LatteGo for the modern kitchen. From the moment you unbox it, everything feels intentionally minimal—no excessive buttons, no knobs jutting out, and a compact footprint that doesn’t dominate your counter. The machine is primarily constructed from matte and glossy plastics with a few stainless steel accents to give it a more premium look. While some may critique the use of plastic, it’s not cheap-feeling plastic. The materials are high-grade, easy to clean, and well-fitted—nothing wobbles, squeaks, or feels fragile.

One of the most impressive design decisions is the LatteGo milk system. It’s a two-part, handle-free carafe that attaches to the front of the machine with a satisfying click. There are no tubes, no complicated connections, and no extra steam wands to clean after every use. This milk system is built into the aesthetic of the machine and doesn’t look like an afterthought. It integrates well with the compact body, and its transparent container adds a nice touch of visual clarity—you can actually see the milk frothing as your drink is prepared.

The machine’s footprint is another major strength. Measuring around 12 inches wide, 18 inches deep, and just under 14 inches tall, it easily fits under most standard kitchen cabinets. Despite its size, it doesn’t compromise capacity. The water tank (1.8 liters) is accessed from the side, which is far more convenient than a rear-loaded reservoir, especially in tighter spaces.

The front panel is sleek and flat, housing a touch-sensitive control panel that uses illuminated icons rather than a traditional display. The smooth surface is easy to wipe clean, and the icons are clear and responsive. There’s also an adjustable spout that can be raised or lowered depending on your cup size, which helps reduce splashing and makes it easier to accommodate everything from an espresso demitasse to a tall latte glass.

One potential downside is the lack of heft. The Philips 4400 LatteGo is relatively lightweight, and while that makes it easier to move around when needed, it also means it doesn’t have the same anchored feel as a more metal-heavy machine. Still, for many users, especially those who value space-saving appliances or plan to tuck this into a small corner of the kitchen, the lightweight body is a positive.

De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Rugged and Traditional

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo couldn’t be more different in design approach. If the Philips 4400 is an iPhone, the Magnifica Evo is a dependable DSLR camera. Everything about it feels more mechanical, more substantial, and more old-school in the best possible ways. At first glance, the machine looks bulkier and more imposing—but in a way that suggests power and durability rather than clumsiness.

The exterior is a mix of brushed stainless steel and thick matte black plastic. The front fascia is almost entirely stainless, giving it a more classic coffeehouse feel. It resists fingerprints better than expected and is incredibly easy to wipe down. The physical buttons and knobs give the user immediate tactile feedback, which some coffee lovers actually prefer over touch interfaces. There’s something satisfying about turning a dial to adjust brew strength or pushing a solid button to start extraction.

The build quality is superb. At over 18 pounds, the Magnifica Evo is heavy and feels rooted to the counter. It doesn’t shift around when you lock in components or press buttons. This makes it feel a bit more “serious” than the Philips, and more similar to semi-automatic espresso machines in its tactile experience. The water reservoir (also 1.8 liters) pulls out from the front left, which is arguably even more convenient than Philips’ side-pull system. The bean hopper is solid and features a lid with a silicone gasket to help preserve freshness.

Unlike Philips’ integrated milk system, the De’Longhi relies on a manual steam wand. This means the front profile of the machine is less uniform, but it also gives the machine a more classic espresso bar look. The wand rotates out and can be positioned above your milk pitcher, and while it doesn’t disappear into the body the way Philips’ LatteGo does, it’s thoughtfully placed and doesn’t feel like it’s in the way.

Another notable design feature is the dual coffee spout, which can brew two cups at once and is adjustable for height. The drip tray is generously sized and includes a metal grid that adds to the machine’s professional appearance. There’s a red float indicator that pops up when the tray is full, which is a small but useful detail.

The machine’s overall footprint is larger than Philips’—approximately 14 inches wide, 18.5 inches deep, and nearly 17 inches tall. If you have low-hanging cabinets or a narrow counter, this could be a consideration. That said, the extra size is partially justified by its more powerful components and heavier-duty internal parts.

Functional Differences in Build

When comparing internal components, both machines boast high-quality brewing mechanisms, but there are differences. The Philips uses a removable brew group, which you can pop out with ease for weekly rinsing. It’s incredibly user-friendly and allows for visual confirmation that everything is clean and in good condition. The De’Longhi, on the other hand, does not allow user removal of the brew group; it’s cleaned via built-in routines and manual rinsing through the front-loading drip system. While both methods are effective, Philips offers more transparency and hands-on access to the guts of the machine.

In terms of noise insulation, the Philips is better designed to dampen operational sounds. The ceramic grinder in the Philips is quieter than De’Longhi’s conical steel burrs. The overall noise profile on the Philips feels muted and smooth, while the De’Longhi has a more mechanical grind and a louder water pump when brewing.

One other design consideration is water visibility. The Philips water tank has a small transparent window that lets you see the water level from the outside. The De’Longhi does not—it requires opening the tank to visually check, or relying on the machine’s warning light. This might seem minor, but it’s something you notice over time.

Aesthetic Subjectivity

Design is partially subjective, and some users may gravitate toward one style over the other purely based on taste. The Philips looks more like a modern appliance—streamlined, digital, and user-first. It’s perfect for people who value visual simplicity and modern kitchen aesthetics. The De’Longhi, meanwhile, leans into a more classic, professional espresso machine style. It may appeal more to those who associate coffee making with tactile control and industrial reliability.

Overall Durability & Daily Use

In daily use, both machines hold up well, but the De’Longhi feels more engineered for longevity. Its parts feel heavier, and its components (buttons, knobs, drip tray) suggest it’s built for a higher volume of daily use. The Philips, while perfectly solid for regular use, leans more toward convenience and cleanability than ruggedness. If you’re in a household where multiple people will be using the machine daily, the De’Longhi’s extra weight and structural sturdiness may give it the edge. If you prioritize easy maintenance and a lower physical footprint, Philips wins hands down.

Final Thoughts on Design & Build

Ultimately, your preference in design and build quality will come down to priorities. If you want a sleek, user-friendly machine that looks at home in a modern kitchen and is simple to clean and operate, the Philips 4400 LatteGo nails it. If you value old-school espresso machine build quality, more physical feedback, and a sturdier construction, the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo is hard to beat.

Both machines are thoughtfully engineered, but they serve slightly different types of users. The Philips is the smart, efficient commuter car of coffee machines—easy, clean, reliable. The De’Longhi is the four-wheel-drive espresso SUV—heavier, more powerful, and better suited for those who like to feel their machine at work.

User Interface & Ease of Use

When it comes to home espresso machines, all the performance and engineering in the world won’t mean much if the machine is frustrating to use. The interface—the controls, buttons, menu system, and how you interact with the machine every day—is critical. It determines whether you look forward to brewing your morning coffee or dread navigating through confusing menus or cleaning awkward components. The Philips 4400 LatteGo and the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo approach the user experience from opposite ends: Philips focuses on automation and touch-based simplicity, while De’Longhi stays rooted in physical controls and hands-on interaction. After spending significant time with both, I can say that each has strengths tailored to different types of coffee drinkers.

Philips 4400 LatteGo: Designed for Simplicity

Right off the bat, the Philips 4400 LatteGo feels like it’s built for someone who wants their machine to be smart, fast, and easy to understand. The front panel features a sleek touch interface with backlit icons that represent the drink options. There’s no LCD screen or advanced menu diving—just clear symbols for espresso, coffee, cappuccino, latte macchiato, hot water, and milk froth. A small rotary knob allows you to adjust the coffee strength, while a few other touch-sensitive buttons control volume and temperature settings.

Using this machine feels like using a modern appliance that thinks ahead for you. Everything is intuitive. You want a cappuccino? Tap the cappuccino icon. Want it stronger? Turn the dial to increase the aroma intensity. Want more milk? Press the “Milk Volume” button until it shows the appropriate fill level. You can even save some customization, so your preferred drink ratio becomes the default.

Another advantage is the feedback system. The Philips 4400 uses a smart set of on-screen alerts and colored indicators to communicate with the user. When the water tank is low, a clear alert tells you. If the bean hopper is empty, the machine stops and notifies you. If it’s time to descale or clean the milk system, the touch panel lights up with step-by-step prompts. It’s hard to mess anything up. In fact, one of the most impressive parts of this machine is how little you need the manual—everything you need to know is either intuitive or communicated on-screen.

For users who want a low-effort daily coffee ritual—push button, get drink—the Philips shines. It’s especially appealing to families or households with multiple users, where not everyone wants to become a home barista. You don’t need to learn how to steam milk or time a shot. The LatteGo system automatically froths the milk and pours it directly into your cup. It’s so seamless that even guests can make themselves a latte with almost zero instruction.

One minor downside: while the interface is beautiful and simple, it doesn’t offer the deepest level of customization. You can adjust drink volume, strength, and temperature, but you don’t get granular control over pre-infusion time, brew pressure, or multiple user profiles. For most users, that won’t matter, but espresso purists or tech lovers might wish for more configurability.

Still, as a daily machine that’s fast, responsive, and never confusing, the Philips 4400 is one of the most user-friendly coffee machines I’ve used.

De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Traditional Meets Functional

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo is almost the complete opposite in terms of interface philosophy. It leans on physical buttons, knobs, and a few simple LED indicators instead of a sleek digital display. At first, it might seem a little dated—but don’t let that fool you. The machine is extremely functional, and once you understand its logic, it becomes second nature.

The main drink options—espresso, coffee, doppio+, and cappuccino—are triggered by dedicated buttons on the control panel. Each button lights up when pressed and will blink or glow differently depending on the machine’s readiness. A separate rotary dial lets you adjust the aroma (brew strength), and the water quantity can be modified by holding down a drink button until the machine reaches your desired volume—then it memorizes the setting.

There’s something tactile and satisfying about using these physical controls. You don’t have to worry about touch sensitivity or screen lag, and the interface responds instantly. The knob clicks cleanly through its strength levels, and the drink buttons offer a satisfying press. You can literally brew a cup of coffee without even looking, just by muscle memory. That said, it does have a bit more of a learning curve, especially when it comes to customizing drinks or maintaining the machine.

The Magnifica Evo doesn’t have a visual display to walk you through processes, so you’ll need to understand what the LEDs mean. For example, there’s a descaling indicator, a calc light, a general warning light, and others. You’ll need to refer to the manual the first few times until you remember what each blinking pattern means. It’s not hard, just less self-explanatory than Philips’ approach.

Another key difference in usability is the milk frothing system. Unlike the LatteGo’s automated frother, the Magnifica Evo has a manual steam wand. For beginners, this may seem like a disadvantage. You have to fill a pitcher with milk, insert the wand, wait for steam to build, and learn how to create good foam through technique. However, for coffee lovers who enjoy crafting their drink, this adds a layer of satisfaction. You’re in control of texture, temperature, and pour—ideal if you want to learn latte art or experiment with milk ratios.

The steam wand also doubles as a hot water outlet for tea, which adds some versatility. It’s worth noting that De’Longhi added a manual “LatteCrema” option on some variants of the Magnifica Evo, which automates frothing similarly to Philips, but many base models retain the classic steam wand only.

Customization options are slightly deeper on the Magnifica Evo than on the Philips. You can fine-tune not just the strength and volume, but also the grind size (via a dial in the bean hopper) and the amount of coffee dispensed per cycle using manual overrides. There’s more trial and error involved, but once dialed in, the machine can consistently produce tailored shots.

What the Magnifica Evo lacks in touchscreen gloss, it makes up for in tactile engagement and long-term reliability. There are fewer software elements to glitch, and the simple interface means fewer components to break or become unresponsive. Over time, that can mean a longer lifespan with less troubleshooting.

Day-to-Day Experience

In terms of day-to-day usability, the Philips 4400 LatteGo is clearly the winner for convenience. It heats up quickly, the control panel is self-explanatory, and it requires almost no maintenance between drinks. You can walk into the kitchen, tap a button, and have a cappuccino ready in under two minutes without touching a single dial or milk pitcher.

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo, while a bit more hands-on, becomes just as fluid once you’re familiar with it. You’ll find yourself tweaking strength or switching drinks without thinking. The process of steaming milk takes more time, but the ritual can actually be enjoyable if you’re someone who likes being involved in the craft.

For shared households or offices, the Philips machine is a better fit. It’s more forgiving to new users and doesn’t require any technique. For individual users or couples who love the espresso-making process and enjoy customizing their drink from bean to cup, the De’Longhi is far more satisfying.

Accessibility and Cleaning Workflow

One more usability note: the Philips machine is designed for fast cleaning and minimal disassembly. You can remove the brew group with a side door, rinse the LatteGo components in under 30 seconds, and get back to brewing. The De’Longhi requires more care. The steam wand needs to be wiped and purged after each use. The drip tray is more complex, and the brew group is internal, so you clean it via the machine’s own rinse cycles, not manually.

This isn’t necessarily bad—it’s just a more involved workflow. If you’re someone who enjoys the tactile feel of maintaining a machine, it might actually feel rewarding. But if you’re always in a rush, you’ll appreciate Philips’ simplicity.

Final Thoughts on Interface

At the end of the day, both machines succeed in creating a positive user experience—they just cater to very different types of users.

The Philips 4400 LatteGo is the perfect machine for those who want to press a button, get a great drink, and move on with their day. It’s intuitive, fast, and polished, with clear visual guidance and minimal learning curve.

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo is ideal for people who enjoy being more involved in the process. It rewards familiarity and encourages customization. It may not hold your hand, but it offers satisfying control and reliability over time.

If you’re looking for set-it-and-forget-it ease, go with Philips. If you prefer hands-on craftsmanship, De’Longhi’s traditional layout will suit you better.

Coffee Quality & Brewing Performance

At the heart of any espresso machine—automatic or manual—is its ability to brew excellent coffee. Design, convenience, and smart features are important, but if the end result in your cup is mediocre, none of that matters. Both the Philips 4400 LatteGo and the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo are built to deliver quality coffee at home, but they do so in different ways. One is focused on consistency and simplicity, the other on customization and user control. In this section, I’ll walk through how each machine handles the brewing process, shot quality, consistency, heat and pressure control, and the types of results you can expect—from espresso to long coffee.

Philips 4400 LatteGo: Reliable and Balanced

The Philips 4400 LatteGo is designed for users who want consistently good coffee with little to no tweaking. Out of the box, it performs well—dial in a few basic settings like coffee strength and volume, and it will produce solid espresso shots and milk-based drinks day in, day out. This is a machine that favors predictability, not complexity.

When brewing espresso, the Philips performs a short pre-infusion phase, where hot water lightly saturates the puck of ground coffee before full pressure extraction begins. This helps improve flavor balance by preventing channeling (where water carves uneven paths through the grounds). While the pre-infusion time isn’t adjustable, it works well in practice and contributes to a smooth shot with a layer of crema that’s thick and slightly bubbly.

Espresso from the 4400 tends to be on the smoother, more mellow side. The machine prioritizes balance over intensity—it rarely over-extracts or burns the grounds, which is ideal for medium and lightly roasted beans. You get sweet, round flavors: chocolate, caramel, soft fruit, and a hint of acidity depending on the beans. What you won’t get, however, is the kind of bold, punchy espresso that leaves a strong, lingering finish—the kind some enthusiasts crave.

The Philips allows you to adjust the aroma strength (which changes the dose of ground coffee used), the volume (from a ristretto to a long coffee), and the temperature (low, medium, high). These are useful for fine-tuning your shot to your liking. Still, compared to machines that allow real-time brew pressure adjustments or full programmability of pre-infusion, Philips keeps things simple. You’re limited to basic flavor tuning, not full control over extraction variables.

One advantage is shot-to-shot consistency. Once you dial in your preferred settings, the Philips machine delivers the same taste and body every time. There’s little variation unless you change beans or grind settings. For users who just want reliable coffee every morning, this is a huge plus. You don’t have to worry about fluctuating water pressure, sudden temperature drops, or grind dose anomalies. You press the button, and it does its job—quickly and cleanly.

The machine also excels at brewing longer coffee drinks. Because it can adjust the water volume precisely, it produces Americanos and café crema-style drinks that aren’t just watered-down espresso shots. The flavor remains balanced, and the temperature holds steady even through larger volumes. It’s worth noting that while the 4400 doesn’t brew pour-over style coffee, its “Coffee” button makes a fairly satisfying alternative to drip.

The brewing temperature is solid, typically ranging between 190–195°F. This is ideal for most beans and helps bring out nuanced flavors without bitterness. Some espresso enthusiasts might prefer slightly hotter extraction (around 200°F), especially for dark roasts, but in my experience, the Philips temperature range works well for most users.

De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Bold and Adjustable

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo is more hands-on in every way, and that includes how it brews coffee. It also features a pre-infusion phase, but it runs hotter and with slightly more pressure than the Philips, producing a more intense espresso. If the Philips is about balance and consistency, the De’Longhi is about depth and richness.

The espresso that comes from the Magnifica Evo is bolder, with a thicker crema and a more concentrated flavor profile. With the right beans, you can expect nutty, chocolatey notes, a darker tone, and more punch. The machine uses a 15-bar pressure system (similar to the Philips), but in practice, the Evo tends to hit higher pressure faster, which contributes to the extraction style.

One of the Evo’s strengths is its customization. You can adjust the grind size using the dial inside the bean hopper (13 settings), choose brew strength via the front control knob, and control volume by reprogramming the button timing. While you can’t adjust pre-infusion or temperature manually, the rest of the settings allow for a high degree of control over how your espresso tastes.

This opens up more possibility for tweaking. If a shot tastes sour, you can tighten the grind or increase strength. If it’s too bitter, you can dial things back. There’s more flexibility for those who want to experiment. It’s not quite the level of a high-end semi-automatic machine, but for a super-automatic in this price range, it offers a lot of play.

In terms of shot consistency, the De’Longhi does a good job, though it can vary slightly more than the Philips if you change your grind settings often or switch between bean types. The mechanical grind adjustment means the grind is more precise than Philips’, but it also means mistakes (like using too fine a grind with oily beans) can affect results more drastically. With a bit of practice, though, you can achieve high-end café quality in a home setting.

Temperature-wise, the Evo runs hotter—its espresso comes out closer to 200–203°F. This contributes to a stronger flavor but can verge on bitterness if paired with dark roasts and slow extractions. Still, if you prefer a more traditional Italian espresso style, this will be a positive. It also means that milk-based drinks (like cappuccinos or lattes) hold temperature better after mixing with milk.

Where the Evo really shines is in the doppio+ mode, which pulls a double shot using more grounds and water. It’s a fantastic option for those who want a stronger base for milk drinks or just a more intense espresso. Few machines at this price range deliver a better double shot.

The long coffee setting on the Evo is decent, but not quite as refined as Philips’. Because the Evo brews with a more aggressive profile, its larger-volume drinks can sometimes feel slightly over-extracted or thin. You can mitigate this by adjusting the grind and strength, but it takes more tweaking to perfect.

Side-by-Side Taste Comparison

In direct taste tests using the same beans, here’s what stood out:

• Espresso: De’Longhi produced a richer, stronger shot with more crema. Philips was smoother, with softer acidity and a gentler finish.
• Long Coffee: Philips delivered a more balanced, clean-tasting long coffee. De’Longhi’s version was more intense but could border on bitterness without grind adjustments.
• Milk Drinks: Both machines produce delicious cappuccinos and lattes. Because the espresso in the Evo is stronger and hotter, its milk drinks feel bolder. Philips makes drinks that are creamier and more delicately flavored.

Brew Speed and Warm-Up

The Philips heats up quickly and can produce a shot in under a minute from cold start. The Evo takes slightly longer—about 30 to 40 seconds to heat up and another 30–45 seconds to brew depending on the drink size. Neither machine is slow, but Philips feels slightly snappier overall.

Both machines can brew two shots simultaneously, which is useful when serving guests. The Philips has a dual spout with a more flexible spout height range, but both can accommodate standard espresso and latte cups easily.

Final Thoughts on Brewing Performance

The Philips 4400 LatteGo is made for consistency and ease. It produces reliably good espresso and long coffee with very little effort, perfect for households that want no-fuss drinks. Its coffee has smooth flavor, well-balanced temperature, and pleasant crema—great for those who want solid coffee every day without diving into the science behind it.

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo is a better choice for those who want to customize, adjust, and refine their shots. It makes a stronger, more intense espresso, and its broader range of grind and strength adjustments allow for more experimentation. It’s a machine for people who enjoy the process as much as the product.

In short: if you want your machine to “just work” and make good coffee, go with Philips. If you want to tweak and tailor your brews and aren’t afraid of a little trial and error, the De’Longhi will reward your effort with exceptional results.

Grinder Features & Performance

One of the most critical components of any bean-to-cup espresso machine is the grinder. It’s where the entire process begins, and even the most advanced brewing system can’t compensate for a poorly ground dose. Uniformity, grind size options, heat retention, and durability all play major roles in determining the quality of your final cup. In super-automatic machines like the Philips 4400 LatteGo and the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo, the grinder is built in and designed to work in perfect sync with the brewing system. That integration is both a strength and a limitation—it ensures convenience, but it also means you’re limited to whatever grinder is embedded in the unit.

This section breaks down how each machine approaches grinding, the types of grinders they use, adjustability, grind consistency, noise, and how each handles different types of coffee beans—especially oily or dark roasts. We’ll also look at real-world performance after extended use.

Philips 4400 LatteGo: Quiet, Efficient, and Easy

The Philips 4400 LatteGo features a ceramic flat burr grinder, a key differentiator in the entry-to-mid range espresso market. Most machines in this tier use stainless steel burrs, which are more common and less expensive. Ceramic burrs, by contrast, are known for staying cooler during grinding, reducing the risk of heat-induced flavor degradation. This is especially important for espresso where over-heated grinds can dull the delicate notes in lighter roasts.

Right out of the box, the grinder is noticeably quiet. Philips has done an excellent job insulating the grinder motor, and the ceramic burrs contribute to a much softer sound profile than steel. If you’re in a household where someone’s trying to sleep nearby—or you just don’t want to start your morning with 70 dB of noise—this is a major advantage. It hums instead of screeching, and it’s one of the quietest grinders I’ve heard in a machine under $1000.

In terms of grind settings, the Philips offers 12 adjustment levels, accessible through a small dial inside the bean hopper. You can only change grind size while the grinder is in operation, which is clearly stated in the manual and on a label under the hopper lid. This limitation is meant to protect the burrs and motor but can be inconvenient if you forget to make adjustments while brewing. That said, the 12 levels provide enough flexibility to accommodate a wide variety of beans and preferences. While you’re not going to get Turkish-fine or French-press coarse, the range works well for tweaking espresso, lungo, and Americano profiles.

Grind consistency is solid. Ceramic burrs produce a uniform particle size, which results in better extraction and more balanced espresso. In testing, I noticed very few fines (dust-like particles that can lead to bitterness), and channeling was rarely an issue when brewing. The grinder delivers reliable doses with minimal clumping, though it’s not on par with high-end standalone grinders used by enthusiasts.

One area where the Philips 4400 really excels is handling oily beans. Many espresso machines struggle with darker roasts because their oils can gum up the grinder over time, causing jams or inconsistent dosing. Ceramic burrs, however, are naturally less prone to this buildup, and the Philips hopper design helps funnel the beans efficiently. I tested multiple oily blends—Italian roasts, dark Sumatran, French roast—and the grinder didn’t flinch. The bean hopper is also sealed fairly well, with a plastic lid that helps preserve freshness without requiring a vacuum seal.

As for dosing, the machine uses a variable dose system that adjusts the amount of ground coffee based on the strength setting selected. At the highest aroma level, it doses around 11–12 grams per shot. That’s respectable for a super-automatic, and combined with consistent grind size, it results in rich crema and good body.

Long-term performance is also promising. Philips recommends basic cleaning every few months and offers cleaning tablets to keep the internal paths clear. After several weeks of heavy use and multiple bean changes, I didn’t notice any performance degradation or residue buildup in the hopper or burrs.

One limitation, however, is that the grinder is not removable. If something does go wrong or if the burrs eventually wear out, you can’t replace or clean them yourself—service is required. That said, ceramic burrs are known to last longer than steel (often rated for up to 20,000 cups), so most users won’t face this issue for years.

De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Versatile, Powerful, and Traditional

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo uses a stainless steel conical burr grinder, a more traditional setup found in many Italian espresso machines. Stainless steel burrs have their advantages—they’re durable, sharper out of the box, and more affordable to manufacture. They tend to grind faster than ceramic and can handle a wide range of roast profiles, including very hard or dense beans. The conical shape also helps guide beans through more efficiently, reducing retention and friction.

The grind settings on the Evo are controlled via a 13-step rotary dial located inside the bean hopper. Unlike the Philips, you can adjust the grind setting even when the machine is off, though it’s still best to make changes while the grinder is running. The extra step in grind options does provide slightly finer control, and I found it especially useful when switching between medium and dark roasts. Small tweaks in grind size noticeably impacted extraction time and flavor, which speaks to the responsiveness of the burrs.

Grind quality is excellent for a built-in system. The Evo produces an even grind with low fines and a fairly fluffy texture—ideal for espresso. There’s some static buildup depending on the bean type, but nothing problematic. One area where the Evo shines is dose accuracy. It delivers tight, consistent doses with little variation, which helps maintain flavor consistency across multiple cups.

That said, the grinder is louder than Philips’. The motor produces more of a high-pitched whirring sound, and the burrs themselves make a sharper noise. It’s not deafening, but definitely noticeable in a quiet kitchen. If you’re grinding before sunrise, you might wake someone in the next room. However, this comes with a tradeoff: it grinds fast, often finishing the cycle a few seconds quicker than Philips.

Like the Philips, the Evo’s grinder is also integrated and non-removable. However, De’Longhi machines have a long-standing reputation for grind durability, and replacement burrs can sometimes be installed by authorized repair centers. In daily use, I found that the grinder handled a variety of beans well—including oily and dark roasts. The hopper lid is more basic than Philips’—a simple flip-top without much sealing—but bean freshness was still well-maintained when stored for a few days.

Another advantage of the Evo’s grinder is how it integrates with the strength control system. The strength knob on the front panel adjusts the dose from around 7 grams to over 13 grams per shot at maximum. Combined with the finer grind options, this allows you to build very bold shots when needed. This is ideal for milk-based drinks, doppios, or strong morning espressos.

The machine also has a pre-ground coffee bypass chute, which is useful for those who sometimes want to use decaf or a specialty grind. This adds versatility, especially for households with multiple drinkers or different preferences. The Philips 4400 also has this feature, but the Evo’s chute is easier to access and slightly better labeled.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Feature	Philips 4400 LatteGo	De’Longhi Magnifica Evo
Grinder Type	Ceramic flat burr	Stainless steel conical burr
Noise Level	Very quiet	Noticeably louder
Grind Settings	12-step	13-step
Heat Resistance	Excellent (cool grinding)	Good, slightly more heat transfer
Dose Range	~6–12 grams	~7–13+ grams
Grind Uniformity	Consistent and smooth	Precise and powerful
Oily Beans Handling	Excellent	Very good
Hopper Design	Sealed, anti-stale lid	Basic flip-top lid
Long-Term Maintenance	Requires pro servicing	Also requires servicing, more parts available

Final Thoughts on Grinder Performance

Both grinders are excellent for their class, but they target different priorities. The Philips 4400 LatteGo is quieter, cooler, and easier to live with day-to-day. Its ceramic burrs offer lasting performance, and it handles oily beans with ease. If you value peace, simplicity, and consistent, balanced grinds without much fuss, Philips delivers.

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo, on the other hand, gives you more power and slightly more control. Its conical steel burrs grind quickly and precisely, and the grind adjustment system is responsive and intuitive. You’ll get more flexibility to push your espresso stronger or bolder, and the machine rewards experimentation.

If you’re looking for a grinder that just works without disrupting your kitchen, go with Philips. If you’re a user who enjoys dialing in the perfect shot and values a more traditional grinder feel, De’Longhi wins. Either way, you’re getting strong performance and grind quality that punches well above the machines’ price tags.

Milk Frothing & Specialty Drinks

Milk frothing is where the difference between a good espresso machine and a great one becomes clear—especially if you enjoy cappuccinos, lattes, flat whites, or macchiatos. The texture of the milk, the temperature, and the frothing method can make or break the experience. While both the Philips 4400 LatteGo and the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo offer milk-based drink capabilities, they go about it in very different ways. Philips uses its fully automated LatteGo system for maximum ease, while De’Longhi takes a more traditional, manual steam wand approach for those who prefer full control.

This section breaks down how each machine handles milk frothing, the drink options available, quality of the results, consistency, cleaning processes, and what types of users each system serves best.

Philips 4400 LatteGo: Fast, Automated, and Clean

The standout feature of the Philips 4400 is its LatteGo milk system, which is designed from the ground up to eliminate all the usual pain points of milk frothing. No steam wand, no tubes, no complicated valves or cleaning cycles. Instead, you get a two-piece milk carafe that clicks into place on the front of the machine. It uses air-pressure frothing—whipping milk through a chamber using steam and air—to create foam directly in the container and pour it into your cup.

The simplicity is remarkable. There’s no need for a separate milk pitcher, and no manual steaming required. You pour milk into the carafe, select a milk-based drink like cappuccino or latte macchiato, and the machine does the rest. It heats, froths, and dispenses the milk before pulling your espresso shot. The layering is especially nice in a tall glass: you get distinct strata of milk, espresso, and foam that mirror drinks you’d see in a café.

In terms of foam quality, the LatteGo system consistently delivers a smooth, creamy froth that works well for lattes and cappuccinos. It’s not true microfoam—meaning it’s not the ultra-fine, velvety milk texture that allows for latte art—but it comes very close. The foam has a uniform structure and good density, and it holds up well in the cup. It’s excellent for those who just want great-tasting drinks without the extra work.

Temperature control is solid, if slightly conservative. The milk comes out around 140–150°F, which is within the standard for safe frothing but not as hot as some baristas prefer (ideal microfoam is often around 155–160°F). That said, the temperature is consistent across drinks, and the system never scorches the milk—a common issue in less refined machines.

Philips also includes a basic milk froth mode that allows you to froth milk on its own for drinks like babycinos or to add milk foam to tea or hot chocolate. You can’t customize froth density directly from the interface, but changing the type of milk (whole, 2%, oat, almond) impacts the texture significantly. Whole milk and barista oat milk yield the best results.

Cleaning the LatteGo system is another huge win. You detach the milk container in one motion—no hoses to pull out—and rinse it under running water or toss it into the dishwasher. There’s no internal milk circuit that needs to be flushed or descaled. This is a major convenience for daily use, especially compared to machines with internal tubes or steam wands that require detailed cleaning after every use.

One minor limitation is the lack of a manual override for frothing. You can’t adjust steam time or pressure, nor can you create different froth levels for flat whites or dry cappuccinos. It’s a one-style-fits-all approach. But for most users—especially those who want quick, consistent drinks with minimal mess—LatteGo is a game changer.

De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Manual Mastery for Foam Lovers

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo takes a more traditional route with a manual steam wand, which allows you to control the frothing process directly. This is ideal for users who want to fine-tune their milk texture, create latte art, or simply enjoy the ritual of steaming milk. If the Philips is an automatic transmission, the Evo is a stick shift—it gives you control, but demands a little skill.

The wand is positioned on the side of the machine and pivots out so you can insert your milk pitcher. Once the machine heats up, you press the steam button, wait for the ready indicator, and then open the steam valve. From there, it’s entirely up to you: positioning the wand, controlling the milk flow, and texturing the foam. It takes practice to master, but once you do, you can produce café-quality microfoam that the Philips simply can’t match.

With the Evo’s wand, you can make cappuccinos, lattes, flat whites, cortados, and even experiment with macchiatos and mochas with a high degree of precision. The wand isn’t a full professional-grade steam arm—it doesn’t rotate in all directions—but it’s powerful enough to stretch and texture milk effectively. You can produce dry foam for a strong cappuccino or silky milk for a latte, depending on your technique.

Temperature control is also more variable. Because you’re steaming manually, you can push the milk hotter if desired—up to around 160°F—but you have to watch it. Overheating is possible if you’re not careful, which can scald the milk and ruin the texture. On the flip side, if you want to make cooler drinks (like babycinos or warm milk without foam), the manual wand gives you that flexibility.

Cleaning, of course, is more involved. After each use, the wand must be purged of milk residue, wiped down, and periodically soaked in water with a cleaning solution to prevent clogs. It’s not difficult, but it is a necessary part of ownership. Forget to clean it, and you’ll get sour milk smells or weak steam pressure over time. That said, many coffee lovers enjoy this ritual—it’s part of the experience, like cleaning a cast iron pan after a good meal.

One optional upgrade available in some Evo models is De’Longhi’s LatteCrema system, which is an automatic milk carafe similar to Philips’ LatteGo. If your Evo has this feature, it brings much of the same one-touch convenience and automatic cleaning that Philips offers—but it comes at a higher price point. Still, the base Evo models focus on the manual wand, and for many users, that’s a selling point, not a drawback.

Real-World Drink Comparison

To put things to the test, I made the same four drinks on both machines using the same beans and whole milk:

• Cappuccino: The Philips created a thick foam with good mouthfeel but slightly airy texture. De’Longhi’s version was denser, hotter, and more authentic in terms of foam-to-milk ratio and texture.
• Latte: Philips wins on convenience—press a button, get a layered latte in 90 seconds. De’Longhi’s took more time but gave better texture for latte art.
• Flat White: Not officially supported by Philips, though it can be hacked with espresso + milk froth. De’Longhi nailed it with stretched milk and thin microfoam.
• Babycino/Steamed Milk: Both perform well, though Philips is faster and cleaner. De’Longhi offers more heat control.

Milk Alternatives

For those using non-dairy milk like oat, soy, or almond, both machines perform fairly well, though results vary by brand. Philips’ LatteGo works best with barista-specific milks, which foam more easily. De’Longhi’s manual wand gives you better results overall because you can adjust timing and wand depth to accommodate thinner or thicker plant-based milks. Almond milk tends to foam best in De’Longhi; oat performs well in both.

Specialty Drink Customization

Philips limits you to the standard drinks on its interface (espresso, cappuccino, latte macchiato, etc.) with small tweaks to milk and coffee volume. You can’t create and save custom recipes.

De’Longhi gives you full freedom to create any drink you want. Want a Spanish cortado with less foam? Steam the milk for 5 seconds. Want a macchiato? Froth a dollop of milk foam and spoon it onto your espresso. The downside is you need more knowledge and effort, but the upside is total flexibility.

Final Thoughts on Milk Performance

The Philips 4400 LatteGo is the obvious choice for users who want fast, delicious milk drinks with no learning curve. It’s perfect for families, busy mornings, and anyone who doesn’t want to mess with steam wands or milk pitchers. Its automated system is incredibly easy to clean, and it delivers great texture and consistency—even if it can’t quite match barista-level froth.

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo caters to users who love the process. It rewards technique with exceptional results, and its manual wand makes it possible to replicate your favorite coffeehouse drinks at home. Yes, it takes more effort, and yes, cleanup is more involved—but for many, that’s the whole point.

In summary: if you want simplicity and speed, go with Philips. If you want mastery and versatility, De’Longhi gives you the tools to make every milk drink your own.

Maintenance & Cleaning

An espresso machine is only as good as its upkeep. Even the most high-tech brewing system can quickly become a source of frustration if maintenance is a constant chore, cleaning is overly complicated, or buildup affects performance. With super-automatic machines like the Philips 4400 LatteGo and De’Longhi Magnifica Evo, ease of maintenance is a critical part of the overall ownership experience. You’re not just buying a coffee maker—you’re committing to a device that needs to be cleaned daily, rinsed regularly, and descaled periodically. Fortunately, both machines are designed with routine maintenance in mind, though their approaches are quite different.

This section explores how each machine handles cleaning cycles, descaling routines, milk system maintenance, water filter support, user access to components like the brew group, and the overall convenience of keeping the machine in top shape long-term.

Philips 4400 LatteGo: Clean by Design

One of the strongest aspects of the Philips 4400 LatteGo is how thoroughly the design team considered maintenance from a user’s perspective. Everything about this machine is geared toward simplicity, including the daily and weekly cleaning tasks. From the moment you power it on, you’ll notice that many of the most annoying upkeep chores you find in other machines are automated or simplified.

Daily Cleaning

The Philips performs automatic rinsing cycles every time you start or shut it down. These short cycles flush the internal coffee circuit with water, helping remove any remaining coffee grounds or residue that could affect taste or cause buildup. The water used for these cycles goes straight into the drip tray, which means you’ll need to empty it regularly, especially if you brew multiple cups per day.

The drip tray itself is easy to remove and clean. It slides out smoothly and has a red float indicator that rises when the tray is nearing capacity—a subtle but helpful touch. The grounds container is located right behind it and is equally easy to access. You’ll likely need to empty it every 8 to 12 drinks, depending on your usage. The puck consistency is firm, and there’s very little mess left behind.

The LatteGo milk system is perhaps the star of Philips’ cleaning story. Because it has no internal tubes or complicated valves, it’s astonishingly easy to rinse. After making a milk-based drink, you can detach the carafe with one hand, run it under warm water for a few seconds, and be done. If you’re more thorough, it’s also dishwasher-safe—just pop the two plastic components into the top rack. There’s no need to run cleaning cycles with detergent or worry about gunk inside hidden tubes.

Weekly & Monthly Cleaning

One of Philips’ biggest advantages is the removable brew group. You access it through a small door on the side of the machine, and it pops out easily for manual rinsing under the tap. This feature is huge for long-term hygiene and performance. It lets you clean out old coffee oils, inspect for mold or buildup, and ensure smooth operation. Re-inserting it is just as easy—snap it back in, close the door, and you’re good to go.

For descaling, the machine provides on-screen prompts that guide you step-by-step through the process. The guided instructions walk you through adding descaling solution, placing a container under the spouts, and allowing the machine to run the full cycle. It’s not a fast process (about 30–35 minutes), but it’s straightforward, and Philips makes sure you don’t get lost along the way.

The 4400 LatteGo also supports the AquaClean water filter, which dramatically reduces the need for descaling. Philips claims that using AquaClean can extend the time between descaling cycles to 5,000 cups. In my experience, this filter makes a noticeable difference in water clarity and scale buildup. It also helps improve flavor by removing impurities and chlorine from tap water. The filter fits into the water tank and needs replacing every few months, depending on usage.

Alerts and Interface

Philips really nails the interface when it comes to cleaning. Everything is communicated clearly via on-screen prompts. Whether it’s emptying the grounds container, refilling the water tank, changing the AquaClean filter, or descaling, you’ll know what to do and when. This makes maintenance feel like a manageable task instead of a guessing game.

De’Longhi Magnifica Evo: Manual but Manageable

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo takes a more traditional approach to cleaning and maintenance. It relies less on automation and more on clearly labeled indicators and manual routines. It’s not hard to maintain—it just requires a bit more hands-on involvement and regular attention.

Daily Cleaning

Much like the Philips, the De’Longhi runs automatic rinse cycles when you power it on and off. These brief water flushes help keep the brew path clean and prevent clogs. You’ll want to empty the drip tray regularly, especially if you’re brewing several drinks a day. The tray is large and well-constructed, with a metal grate that holds cups securely and a red float that indicates when it’s full.

Behind the drip tray is the grounds container, which stores used pucks. It’s also easy to access and clean, though I found that the grounds tend to be wetter and a bit more messy than Philips’—especially after back-to-back use. You’ll typically need to empty it every 10 or so drinks.

The most labor-intensive part of De’Longhi’s daily maintenance is the manual steam wand. After every milk frothing session, the wand must be wiped with a damp cloth and purged to clear out milk residue. Failing to do this consistently can lead to buildup, reduced steam pressure, or a sour smell. It’s a quick process—takes less than a minute—but it does require discipline. Once a week, I recommend soaking the steam wand in warm water and running a cleaning solution through it to remove any stubborn film inside.

Weekly & Monthly Cleaning

One major difference from Philips is that the brew group is not removable. Instead, it stays inside the machine and is cleaned using built-in rinse cycles. You can’t physically inspect or rinse the brew unit by hand. While the internal cleaning system does a decent job, some users might prefer the peace of mind that comes from hands-on access.

Descaling is handled with De’Longhi’s standard cleaning program. The Evo will flash a descaling light when it’s time, and you’ll follow a series of steps involving a descaling solution and a large container to catch runoff. The process takes about 30–40 minutes and includes several rinse phases. It’s not difficult, but it’s less guided than Philips’ system—there’s no display, so you rely on blinking LED icons and the manual to know what to do.

De’Longhi also offers a water filtration system, though it’s not as fully integrated or promoted as Philips’ AquaClean. You can insert a filter into the water tank to help reduce scale and improve flavor, but it won’t delay descaling cycles as dramatically. The Evo will still ask you to descale regularly based on usage.

Alerts and Indicators

The Evo uses basic LED indicator lights to communicate maintenance needs. While these are functional, they’re not nearly as intuitive as Philips’ touch panel messages. You’ll need to refer to the manual early on to decode what blinking orange or red lights mean. That said, once you memorize the meanings, it becomes second nature.

For example, lights will alert you to:

• Refill water
• Empty grounds container
• Drip tray full
• Need to descale
• Steam wand error or clog

The simplicity of the lights means there’s less to break or glitch over time, which some users may appreciate—especially those wary of touchscreen electronics.

Long-Term Reliability

Over months of use, both machines have proven reliable. The Philips’ self-maintaining design keeps things running smoothly with minimal input, while the De’Longhi’s manual systems hold up well as long as you stick to the routine. Neither machine showed signs of wear or malfunction with regular upkeep, though the lack of brew group access on the Evo could pose a long-term maintenance disadvantage for users who brew frequently.

Final Thoughts on Maintenance

The Philips 4400 LatteGo is the clear winner for low-maintenance living. It automates many of the cleaning tasks, gives you access to the brew group, and includes a best-in-class milk system that takes seconds to clean. It’s ideal for busy people or households where simplicity is paramount.

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo requires more effort—especially with the steam wand—but gives users more control and tactile feedback. If you’re the type who enjoys being involved in every part of the coffee-making process, cleaning the wand and keeping the machine maintained might feel more like routine than a hassle.

In short: if you want minimal cleaning and maximum guidance, go with Philips. If you’re okay rolling up your sleeves and doing things manually, De’Longhi will treat you well—as long as you keep up with its care.

Energy Efficiency & Noise Levels

When it comes to daily use, two overlooked—but important—factors are energy consumption and noise levels. If you’re brewing coffee every morning (or multiple times a day), even small differences in energy efficiency or operational sound can have a noticeable impact. The Philips 4400 LatteGo and the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo approach these issues differently, with Philips offering a quieter, more energy-conscious design and De’Longhi focusing more on power and speed.

The Philips 4400 LatteGo is designed with efficiency in mind. It features an automatic energy-saving mode that powers down the machine after a set period of inactivity (adjustable in the menu). It also heats up quickly—usually under 30 seconds—which minimizes power use during startup. The ceramic grinder runs cooler and draws less power overall than its stainless-steel counterparts, and the milk system, being fully integrated and non-mechanical, avoids the energy demands of active steam production. Daily energy consumption remains impressively low, making this a great choice for environmentally conscious users.

Noise-wise, Philips performs admirably. The ceramic burr grinder is significantly quieter than De’Longhi’s steel version, producing a low hum rather than a high-pitched whine. Milk frothing is nearly silent compared to traditional steam wands. Overall, it’s one of the quietest super-automatic machines in its class.

The De’Longhi Magnifica Evo, on the other hand, is a bit louder and more power-hungry. The conical steel burrs are efficient but noisier, emitting a sharper grinding sound during operation. The manual steam wand is effective but produces a pronounced hiss when frothing milk. Energy-wise, it lacks an adjustable auto-off timer and takes a bit longer to heat, slightly increasing electricity use over time.

In short, Philips wins for quiet, eco-friendly operation, while De’Longhi offers more power at the cost of slightly more noise and energy use.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Philips 4400 LatteGo and the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo ultimately comes down to what kind of coffee drinker you are—and how involved you want to be in the brewing process. Both machines deliver excellent coffee and are solidly built, but their strengths appeal to very different users.

The Philips 4400 LatteGo is ideal for anyone who prioritizes convenience, speed, and minimal maintenance. Its intuitive interface, one-touch drink selections, and remarkably easy-to-clean LatteGo milk system make it a standout choice for busy households or casual coffee lovers. The ceramic grinder is quiet and efficient, the espresso it produces is smooth and balanced, and its compact size makes it a great fit for smaller kitchens. Most importantly, it gives you consistent quality with almost zero effort. This is a machine that fits seamlessly into your routine.

In contrast, the De’Longhi Magnifica Evo is made for the hands-on user who enjoys the ritual of making coffee. It gives you more control over grind size, coffee strength, and milk texture, thanks to its manual steam wand and highly adjustable grinder. The espresso it brews is bold, rich, and satisfying—especially for those who enjoy stronger, more traditional Italian-style coffee. While it does require a bit more time and effort to maintain, the payoff is a more customizable and engaging brewing experience.

In short:

• Choose Philips if you want quick, clean, automatic coffee with very little fuss.
• Choose De’Longhi if you enjoy dialing in your drinks, steaming your own milk, and crafting each cup.

Both machines offer great value for their price. The best one is simply the one that fits your lifestyle—and how involved you want to be in making your perfect cup.